These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9711282)

  • 1. [Digital mammography: experiences in its clinical application].
    Schönhofen H; Arnold W; Hess T; Allgayer B
    Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9711282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.
    Lewin JM; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Moss LJ; Isaacs PK; Karellas A; Cutter GR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):671-7. PubMed ID: 12185042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital mammo promising, but still awaiting proof.
    Hayes JC
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Jan; Suppl():IR35-6. PubMed ID: 11692369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized detection of malignant tumors on digital mammograms.
    Kobatake H; Murakami M; Takeo H; Nawano S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 May; 18(5):369-78. PubMed ID: 10416798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital mammography.
    D'Orsi CJ
    Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Apr; 2(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12116601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial.
    Yaffe MJ; Bloomquist AK; Mawdsley GE; Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Fajardo LL; Boone JM; Kanal K; Mahesh M; Fleischman RC; Och J; Williams MB; Beideck DJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):737-52. PubMed ID: 16878576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The diagnostic accuracy of a digital mammography system with photostimulable storage phosphors used with automatic reading].
    Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; De Gaspari A; Tacchini S; Camalori M; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):46-51. PubMed ID: 8614730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Possibilities and limits of mammography with special reference to breast carcinoma--a comparison of clinical, mammography and histologic diagnoses].
    Neumann P; Romann D; Camara O; Riedel HH
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(4):154-9. PubMed ID: 9206920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tomosynthesis combined with mammography detects more breast cancers than mammography alone].
    Scherz N
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2014 Oct; 103(20):1213-4. PubMed ID: 25270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast CT.
    Glick SJ
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which clinical, radiological, histological, and molecular parameters are associated with the absence of enhancement of known breast cancers with Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM)?
    Bicchierai G; Amato F; Vanzi B; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Di Naro F; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Cozzi D; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast; 2020 Dec; 54():15-24. PubMed ID: 32889303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The adverse implications of the transition from film to digital mammography for performing surveillance in patients with a history of breast cancer or significant risk factors for the disease.
    Ward RL; Speakman D; Henderson MA
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2011 Dec; 7(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 22151986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital mammographic screening in Japan.
    Ishibashi T; Kawasumi Y; Yamada T; Sai M; Uematsu T; Uchiyama N
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 20072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
    McLaughlin CT; Neal CH; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The basics and implementation of digital mammography.
    Zuley ML
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):893-901. PubMed ID: 20868892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
    Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Efficacy of storage phosphor-based digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer--comparison with film-screen mammography].
    Kitahama H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 May; 51(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 1651472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy of film/screen mammography. A three-year experience.
    Warren DL; Stelling CB
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 87(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 2723524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.