These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9711282)

  • 21. Evaluation of lumpectomy surgical specimen radiographs in subclinical, in situ and invasive breast cancer, and factors predicting positive margins.
    Rua C; Lebas P; Michenet P; Ouldamer L
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2012 Nov; 93(11):871-7. PubMed ID: 23021868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital breast techniques excel at image display.
    Yaffe MJ
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 May; 15(5):79-85, 105. PubMed ID: 10148580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital mammography in Japan.
    Uematsu T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):158. PubMed ID: 20072820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimal invasive biopsy results of "uncertain malignant potential" in digital mammography screening: high prevalence but also high predictive value for malignancy.
    Weigel S; Decker T; Korsching E; Biesheuvel C; Wöstmann A; Böcker W; Hungermann D; Roterberg K; Tio J; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2011 Aug; 183(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21506072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Vacuum needle biopsy of the breast with digital stereotaxic control--initial experiences with the Mammotome in Baden].
    Wetter D; Otto R
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2001 Sep; 90(37):1582-6. PubMed ID: 11594124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Vacuum punch biopsy under digital stereotaxic control, a new procedure in percutaneous diagnostic incision and excision biopsy of mammographic findings: initial experience].
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Schaumlöffel U; Götz L; Buchmann J; Lampe D; Methfessel G; Spielmann RP
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 9376557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
    Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Current state of digital mammography.
    Shiraishi A
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 18365303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conversion to digital mammography in a private practice.
    Destounis S; Morgan R; Arieno A; Demay S; Kissel D
    Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 21134525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
    Monreal S
    Radiol Technol; 2018 May; 89(5):518-520. PubMed ID: 29793915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of a mobile digital specimen radiography system for intraoperative specimen verification.
    Wang Y; Ebuoma L; Saksena M; Liu B; Specht M; Rafferty E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):457-62. PubMed ID: 25055285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital and film mammography.
    Crystal P; Strano S
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16481649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The state of the art in technology for digital mammography].
    Torres Cabrera R
    Radiologia; 2010 Jun; 52 Suppl 1():7-13. PubMed ID: 20338602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Digital mammography].
    Otsuka K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 12881672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital and film mammography.
    Keen JD
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16482674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. FDA clears Siemens' Opdima digital mammography biopsy & spot imaging system for U.S. marketing.
    Compr Ther; 1997 Sep; 23(9):621. PubMed ID: 9285164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating the effect of computer-aided detection on the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Sacks WM
    Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):597-8; author reply 598-9. PubMed ID: 12563163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.