BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9712429)

  • 1. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer.
    Wheeler TM; Dillioglugil O; Kattan MW; Arakawa A; Soh S; Suyama K; Ohori M; Scardino PT
    Hum Pathol; 1998 Aug; 29(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 9712429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis.
    Egan AJ; Bostwick DG
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 Dec; 21(12):1496-500. PubMed ID: 9414194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contemporary survival results and the role of radiation therapy in patients with node negative seminal vesicle invasion following radical prostatectomy.
    Eggener SE; Roehl KA; Smith ND; Antenor JA; Han M; Catalona WJ
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1150-5. PubMed ID: 15758725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor.
    Yossepowitch O; Sircar K; Scardino PT; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Reuter VE
    J Urol; 2002 Nov; 168(5):2011-5. PubMed ID: 12394697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables.
    Ferrari MK; McNeal JE; Malhotra SM; Brooks JD
    Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):749-53. PubMed ID: 15491714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
    van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of >/=8.
    Manoharan M; Bird VG; Kim SS; Civantos F; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2003 Oct; 92(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 14511029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic value of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kimura K; Tsuzuki T; Kato M; Saito AM; Sassa N; Ishida R; Hirabayashi H; Yoshino Y; Hattori R; Gotoh M
    Prostate; 2014 May; 74(6):680-7. PubMed ID: 24481730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Recurrence following radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Analysis of clinical, biological and anatomo-pathological prognostic factors].
    Feyaerts A; Delrée A; Lorge F; Opsomer RJ; Wese FX; Van Cangh PJ; Draguet AP; Cosyns JP
    Acta Urol Belg; 1997 Mar; 65(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9245198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seminal vesicle involvement after radical prostatectomy: predicting risk factors for progression.
    Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Johnson CW; McKiernan JM; Goluboff ET; Abbou CC; Olsson CA; Benson MC
    Urology; 2003 Aug; 62(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 12893340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
    Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seminal vesicle invasion combined with extraprostatic extension is associated with higher frequency of biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastasis than seminal vesicle invasion alone: Proposal for further pT3 prostate cancer subclassification.
    Rehman A; El-Zaatari ZM; Han SH; Shen SS; Ayala AG; Miles B; Divatia MK; Ketcham MS; Chung BM; Rogers JT; Ro JY
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Dec; 49():151611. PubMed ID: 32956915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Eastham JA; Kattan MW; Riedel E; Begg CB; Wheeler TM; Gerigk C; Gonen M; Reuter V; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2292-5. PubMed ID: 14634399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion.
    Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Brenner PC; Kooner R; Golovsky D; O'Neill GF; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1884-93. PubMed ID: 12673714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
    Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.