These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9714160)

  • 1. Recognition of native structure from complete enumeration of low-resolution models with constraints.
    Ozkan B; Bahar I
    Proteins; 1998 Aug; 32(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 9714160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Huang ES; Subbiah S; Tsai J; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Apr; 257(3):716-25. PubMed ID: 8648635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Native atomic burials, supplemented by physically motivated hydrogen bond constraints, contain sufficient information to determine the tertiary structure of small globular proteins.
    Pereira de Araújo AF; Gomes AL; Bursztyn AA; Shakhnovich EI
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):971-83. PubMed ID: 17847091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein imperfections: separating intrinsic from extrinsic variation of torsion angles.
    Butterfoss GL; Richardson JS; Hermans J
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Jan; 61(Pt 1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15608380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategy for supplementing structure calculations using limited data with hydrophobic distance restraints.
    Alexandrescu AT
    Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 15162492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys.
    Park B; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1996 May; 258(2):367-92. PubMed ID: 8627632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A knowledge-based move set for protein folding.
    Chen WW; Yang JS; Shakhnovich EI
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 17143895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A coarse-grained protein force field for folding and structure prediction.
    Maupetit J; Tuffery P; Derreumaux P
    Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(2):394-408. PubMed ID: 17600832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure.
    Park BH; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Jun; 249(2):493-507. PubMed ID: 7783205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Another look at the conditions for the extraction of protein knowledge-based potentials.
    Betancourt MR
    Proteins; 2009 Jul; 76(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 19089977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular dynamics simulation of a high-affinity antibody-protein complex: the binding site is a mosaic of locally flexible and preorganized rigid regions.
    Sinha N; Smith-Gill SJ
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2005; 43(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 16049350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling correlated main-chain motions in proteins for flexible molecular recognition.
    Zavodszky MI; Lei M; Thorpe MF; Day AR; Kuhn LA
    Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(2):243-61. PubMed ID: 15340912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimalist representations and the importance of nearest neighbor effects in protein folding simulations.
    Colubri A; Jha AK; Shen MY; Sali A; Berry RS; Sosnick TR; Freed KF
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Nov; 363(4):835-57. PubMed ID: 16982067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
    Liu Z; Dominy BN; Shakhnovich EI
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The folding pathway of ubiquitin from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
    Marianayagam NJ; Jackson SE
    Biophys Chem; 2004 Oct; 111(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 15381313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ab initio computational modeling of loops in G-protein-coupled receptors: lessons from the crystal structure of rhodopsin.
    Mehler EL; Hassan SA; Kortagere S; Weinstein H
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(3):673-90. PubMed ID: 16729264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of multiple well defined conformations on small-angle scattering of proteins in solution.
    Heller WT
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Jan; 61(Pt 1):33-44. PubMed ID: 15608373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.