These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9714286)

  • 1. Changes in the Caucasian male facial profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the twentieth century.
    Nguyen DD; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 9714286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis.
    Auger TA; Turley PK
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 10337246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles.
    Sutter RE; Turley PK
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 9851345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century.
    Yehezkel S; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 15067255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the frontal esthetic preferences in the lower facial portion of Koreans and Caucasians.
    Kang YG; Lee YH; Kook YA; Kim SH; Sinclair PM
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19582252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation.
    Chew MT; Sandham A; Soh J; Wong HB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17685780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Balanced angular profile analysis.
    Rhee SC; Kang SR; Park HS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):535-44. PubMed ID: 15277828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue profile in white Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Scavone H; Zahn-Silva W; do Valle-Corotti KM; Nahás AC
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 18193966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile.
    Fernández-Riveiro P; Smyth-Chamosa E; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Suárez-Cunqueiro M
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 12938846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Croatians using of linear measurements.
    Milosević SA; Varga ML; Slaj M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 18216697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):959-69; discussion 969-70. PubMed ID: 10981975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of soft tissue facial profile in white males.
    Zylinski CG; Nanda RS; Kapila S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 1598891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of three-dimensional changes in lip vermilion in adult female patients after orthodontic extraction: a retrospective longitudinal study.
    Shen LH; Xie TY; Jiang RP; Jiang YR; Chen G; Xu TM; Han B
    Head Face Med; 2021 Mar; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 33741006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.
    Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The perception of lip aesthetics in the context of facial proportions-An eye-tracking-based analysis.
    Kempa J; Alfertshofer M; Swift A; Green JB; Antoszewski B; Timler W; Cotofana S; Kasielska-Trojan A
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2024 Aug; 38(8):1606-1617. PubMed ID: 38084783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians.
    Mejia-Maidl M; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):953-8. PubMed ID: 16448237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.