These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9714379)

  • 21. Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields.
    Yoshiura T; Ueno S; Iramina K; Masuda K
    Brain Res; 1995 Dec; 703(1-2):139-44. PubMed ID: 8719625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Face-selective responses in combined EEG/MEG recordings with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).
    Hauk O; Rice GE; Volfart A; Magnabosco F; Ralph MAL; Rossion B
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118460. PubMed ID: 34363957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparing the Performance of Popular MEG/EEG Artifact Correction Methods in an Evoked-Response Study.
    Haumann NT; Parkkonen L; Kliuchko M; Vuust P; Brattico E
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():7489108. PubMed ID: 27524998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
    Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity.
    Tiitinen H; Alho K; Huotilainen M; Ilmoniemi RJ; Simola J; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Sep; 30(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 8416081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal-space separation: demonstration with single-trial auditory-evoked responses.
    Taulu S; Hari R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 May; 30(5):1524-34. PubMed ID: 18661502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Source localization of event-related potentials to pitch change mapped onto age-appropriate MRIs at 6 months of age.
    Hämäläinen JA; Ortiz-Mantilla S; Benasich AA
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):1910-8. PubMed ID: 20951812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
    Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frequency specific impairment of automatic pitch change detection by fMRI acoustic noise: an MEG study.
    Novitski N; Maess B; Tervaniemi M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jul; 155(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 16530843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maturation of obligatory auditory responses and their neural sources: evidence from EEG and MEG.
    Ruhnau P; Herrmann B; Maess B; Schröger E
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):630-9. PubMed ID: 21726651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The auditory evoked sustained field: origin and frequency dependence.
    Pantev C; Eulitz C; Elbert T; Hoke M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 90(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 7509276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Memory-based mismatch response to changes in duration of auditory stimuli: an MEG study.
    Hsu WY; Cheng CH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 121(10):1744-50. PubMed ID: 20471314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory evoked responses are additive to brain oscillations.
    Mäkinen VT; Tiitinen H; May PJ
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():45. PubMed ID: 16015712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change.
    Maess B; Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(2):561-71. PubMed ID: 17596966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimized mismatch negativity paradigm reflects deficits in schizophrenia patients. A combined EEG and MEG study.
    Thönnessen H; Zvyagintsev M; Harke KC; Boers F; Dammers J; Norra Ch; Mathiak K
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Feb; 77(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 18060677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parametric merging of MEG and fMRI reveals spatiotemporal differences in cortical processing of spoken words and environmental sounds in background noise.
    Renvall H; Formisano E; Parviainen T; Bonte M; Vihla M; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jan; 22(1):132-43. PubMed ID: 21613467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lateralization of auditory sensory gating and neuropsychological dysfunction in schizophrenia.
    Thoma RJ; Hanlon FM; Moses SN; Edgar JC; Huang M; Weisend MP; Irwin J; Sherwood A; Paulson K; Bustillo J; Adler LE; Miller GA; Cañive JM
    Am J Psychiatry; 2003 Sep; 160(9):1595-605. PubMed ID: 12944333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Magnetoencephalography is feasible for infant assessment of auditory discrimination.
    Cheour M; Imada T; Taulu S; Ahonen A; Salonen J; Kuhl P
    Exp Neurol; 2004 Nov; 190 Suppl 1():S44-51. PubMed ID: 15498541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When sound and picture do not fit: Mismatch negativity and sensory interaction.
    Ullsperger P; Erdmann U; Freude G; Dehoff W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16290115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.