These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9714745)

  • 21. Effects of the short-term learned significance of task-irrelevant sounds on involuntary attention in children and adults.
    Wetzel N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Oct; 98(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26093029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency discrimination at different frequency levels as indexed by electrophysiological and behavioral measures.
    Novitski N; Tervaniemi M; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 15130586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
    Hölig C; Berti S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age dependent changes of distractibility and reorienting of attention revisited: an event-related potential study.
    Berti S; Grunwald M; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1491():156-66. PubMed ID: 23159833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction.
    Roeber U; Berti S; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 15722214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When long appears short: Effects of auditory distraction on event-related potential correlates of time perception.
    Getzmann S; Arnau S; Gajewski PD; Wascher E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 55(1):121-137. PubMed ID: 34859527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?
    Horváth J
    Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 23913121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Boll S; Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 19386054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: an event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Roeber U; Berti S; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Feb; 114(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 12559243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 20064580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological Correlates of Absolute Pitch in a Passive Auditory Oddball Paradigm: a Direct Replication Attempt.
    Greber M; Rogenmoser L; Elmer S; Jäncke L
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 30637328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.
    Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 25270560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of significance of auditory location changes on event related brain potentials and pitch discrimination performance.
    Koistinen S; Rinne T; Cederström S; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1427():44-53. PubMed ID: 22055456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors.
    Zhang P; Chen X; Yuan P; Zhang D; He S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):715-24. PubMed ID: 16956775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ERP correlates of pre-attentive processing of Cantonese lexical tones: The effects of pitch contour and pitch height.
    Tsang YK; Jia S; Huang J; Chen HC
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 20970477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence.
    Roeber U; Berti S; Müller D; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):425-38. PubMed ID: 19207193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distraction and reorientation in children: a behavioral and ERP study.
    Wetzel N; Berti S; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(8):1355-8. PubMed ID: 15167565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.