515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9714956)
1. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative clinical investigation of 2 early loaded ITI dental implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible.
Røynesdal AK; Amundrud B; Hannaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11324212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: results after 1 year of loading.
Hallman M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 11669256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized multicenter comparison of 2 IMZ and 4 TPS screw implants supporting bar-retained overdentures in 425 edentulous mandibles.
Mau J; Behneke A; Behneke N; Fritzemeier CU; Gomez-Roman G; d'Hoedt B; Spiekermann H; Strunz V; Yong M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):835-47. PubMed ID: 14696659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study.
Heydenrijk K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 12814319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 5-year prospective multicenter study on 1-stage smooth-surface Brånemark System implants with early loading in edentulous mandibles.
Friberg B; Raghoebar GM; Grunert I; Hobkirk JA; Tepper G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18700372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the Extension Crest device. A 1-3-year multicenter follow-up study.
Chiapasco M; Ferrini F; Casentini P; Accardi S; Zaniboni M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 16672021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study.
Capelli M; Zuffetti F; Del Fabbro M; Testori T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 17929526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants.
Wheeler SL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 8752555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures.
Spiekermann H; Jansen VK; Richter EJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 7744443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with a definitive prosthesis supported by an intraorally welded titanium bar.
Degidi M; Nardi D; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 19492651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate loading of implants with fixed restorations in the completely edentulous mandible: report of 27 patients from a private practice.
Ganeles J; Rosenberg MM; Holt RL; Reichman LH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 11432662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 12500876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study.
Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Four-year follow-up of larger-diameter implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a resorbable membrane or a resorbable alloplastic material.
Prosper L; Gherlone EF; Redaelli S; Quaranta M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 14696661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
