141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9715199)
21. Pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilization with extrication collars and headblocks: An observational study.
Ham WH; Schoonhoven L; Schuurmans MJ; Leenen LP
Injury; 2016 Sep; 47(9):1924-31. PubMed ID: 27158006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Range-of-motion restriction and craniofacial tissue-interface pressure from four cervical collars.
Tescher AN; Rindflesch AB; Youdas JW; Jacobson TM; Downer LL; Miers AG; Basford JR; Cullinane DC; Stevens SR; Pankratz VS; Decker PA
J Trauma; 2007 Nov; 63(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 17993960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improvised vs Standard Cervical Collar to Restrict Spine Movement in the Backcountry Environment.
Porter A; Difrancesca M; Slack S; Hudecek L; McIntosh SE
Wilderness Environ Med; 2019 Dec; 30(4):412-416. PubMed ID: 31706730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical and radiological evaluation of Vertebrace extrication collars.
Solot JA; Winzelberg GG
J Emerg Med; 1990; 8(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 2351802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses.
Chin KR; Auerbach JD; Adams SB; Sodl JF; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16481953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model.
DiPaola MJ; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Horodyski M; Del Rossi G; Sawers A; Bloch D; Rechtine GR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18525488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: roentgenographic and goniometric method of study.
Fisher SV; Bowar JF; Awad EA; Gullickson G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1977 Mar; 58(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 843201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing the Efficacy of Methods for Immobilizing the Cervical Spine.
Rahmatalla S; DeShaw J; Stilley J; Denning G; Jennissen C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 29916958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cervical spine segmental vertebral motion in healthy volunteers feigning restriction of neck flexion and extension.
Puglisi F; Strimpakos N; Papathanasiou M; Kapreli E; Bonelli A; Sgambetterra S; Ferrari R
Int J Legal Med; 2007 Sep; 121(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16847699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of comfort assessment of NECKLITE vs. NeXsplint cervical collar. Pilot data.
Ladny M; Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Nov; 36(11):2127-2128. PubMed ID: 29752163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of cervical spine immobilization methods.
Podolsky S; Baraff LJ; Simon RR; Hoffman JR; Larmon B; Ablon W
J Trauma; 1983 Jun; 23(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 6864837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The management and prevention of rigid cervical collar complications.
Webber-Jones JE; Thomas CA; Bordeaux RE
Orthop Nurs; 2002; 21(4):19-25; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 12224182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The 'Necksafe' head articulation control system: a novel cervical immobilisation device.
Sparke A; Torlei K; Voss S; Page M; Benger J; Matthews E; Hillman M; Hart D; McLaughlin E; Carter J; Harris N
Emerg Med J; 2015 Jul; 32(7):564-70. PubMed ID: 25092798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical immobilization in trauma patients: soft collars better than rigid collars? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bäcker HC; Elias P; Braun KF; Johnson MA; Turner P; Cunningham J
Eur Spine J; 2022 Dec; 31(12):3378-3391. PubMed ID: 36181555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Defining radiographic criteria for flexion-extension studies of the cervical spine.
Knopp R; Parker J; Tashjian J; Ganz W
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jul; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11423809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cervical Spine Motion During Vehicle Extrication of Healthy Volunteers.
Gabrieli A; Nardello F; Geronazzo M; Marchetti P; Liberto A; Arcozzi D; Polati E; Cesari P; Zamparo P
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2020; 24(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 31750763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of cervical collars and verbal instructions in minimising spinal movement during self-extrication following a motor vehicle collision - a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers.
Nutbeam T; Fenwick R; May B; Stassen W; Smith JE; Wallis L; Dayson M; Shippen J
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 29(1):108. PubMed ID: 34332623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
