These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9715459)

  • 1. [Diagnosis of visual field defects by new perimetry methods--rapid screening methods and their limits].
    Fahle M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Jun; 212(6):aA6-10. PubMed ID: 9715459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Component perimetry: a fast method to detect visual field defects caused by brain lesions.
    Bachmann G; Fahle M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 41(10):2870-86. PubMed ID: 10967040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency doubling perimetry screening mode compared to the full-threshold mode.
    Stoutenbeek R; Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):493-7. PubMed ID: 15491476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blue-on-yellow perimetry in the complete type of congenital stationary night blindness.
    Terasaki H; Miyake Y; Nomura R; Horiguchi M; Suzuki S; Kondo M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Oct; 40(11):2761-4. PubMed ID: 10509678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population.
    Becker K; Semes L
    Optometry; 2003 Mar; 74(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 12645850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?
    Fong KC; Byles DB; Constable PH
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Apr; 17(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12724694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introduction to formal visual field testing, Part II: Anatomic correlation to visual field abnormalities.
    Cohen S; Kawasaki A
    J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 1999; 18(6):259-67; quiz 268-9. PubMed ID: 10795199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
    North RV; Jones AL; Hunter E; Morgan JE; Wild JM
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Interpretation of visual field with Humphrey Zeiss Analyser].
    Brătulescu M; Zemba M
    Oftalmologia; 2002; 53(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 12474453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The status of color fields today.
    Bailey JE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Sep; 51(9):843-7. PubMed ID: 7005298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of new psychophysics and perimetry with electrophysiological techniques in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Arden GB
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 4(2):14-21. PubMed ID: 10148457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Color vision testing determines deficiencies, ocular defects.
    Foder J
    J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 1999; 18(3):93. PubMed ID: 10633655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer].
    Lachkar Y; Barrault O; Lefrançois A; Demailly P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Realini T; Lai MQ; Barber L
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Vigabatrin and visual field defects. A Danish material with evaluation of different screening methods].
    Riise P; Fledelius HC; Rogvi-Hansen Bà
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1034-8. PubMed ID: 12645411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of test duration as a screening criterion for frequency doubling perimetry.
    Thomas R; Parikh R; Muliyil J; Bhat S; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):562-3. PubMed ID: 15013885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing the use of frequency doubling technology perimetry in community vision screenings.
    Nehmad L; Madonna RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 18594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.