These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9715677)

  • 1. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relation between isometric lifting strength and muscular fitness measures.
    Birch K; Sinnerton S; Reilly T; Lees A
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jan; 37(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 8112286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.
    Stevenson JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Greenhorn DR; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 2714247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.
    Kumar S; Garand D
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):861-80. PubMed ID: 1633793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isometric strength assessment, part I: static testing does not accurately predict dynamic lifting capacity.
    Feeler L; St James JD; Schapmire DW
    Work; 2010; 37(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 20978337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of factor-score-based models to explain and predict maximal box-lifting performance.
    Stevenson J; Bryant T; Greenhorn D; Deakin J; Smith T
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 7895736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of isometric and isoinertial testing in symmetric and asymmetric lifting.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jul; 41(7):1050-9. PubMed ID: 9674377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum isoinertial lifting capabilities for different lifting ranges and container dimensions.
    Lee TH
    Appl Ergon; 2005 May; 36(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 15854581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of ankle isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic strength and power testing in older women.
    Webber SC; Porter MM
    Phys Ther; 2010 Aug; 90(8):1165-75. PubMed ID: 20488976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trunk muscle endurance measurement. Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects.
    Mayer T; Gatchel R; Betancur J; Bovasso E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Apr; 20(8):920-6; discussion 926-7. PubMed ID: 7644957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables.
    Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Appl Ergon; 1993 Aug; 24(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 15676920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.
    Chaffin DB; Stump BS; Nussbaum MA; Baker G
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 9973874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.