276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9717538)
1. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The accuracy of angiography and CT angiography of the carotid bifurcation compared to macro-morphological correlation].
Post K; Eckstein HH; Hoffmann E; Volke A; Post S; Allenberg JR; Kauffmann GW
Rofo; 1996 Mar; 164(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 8672773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The initial results of spiral CT angiography in demonstrating stenoses of the a. carotis].
Link J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Brossmann J; Grabener M; Voss C; Heller M
Rofo; 1995 Mar; 162(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 7718774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
Binaghi S; Maeder P; Uské A; Meuwly JY; Devuyst G; Meuli RA
Eur Neurol; 2001; 46(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 11455180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Spiral CT angiography versus DSA in detection of carotid stenoses].
Link J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Wesner F; Steffens JC; Brossmann J; Heller M
Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1018-22. PubMed ID: 9092221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease.
Anderson GB; Ashforth R; Steinke DE; Ferdinandy R; Findlay JM
Stroke; 2000 Sep; 31(9):2168-74. PubMed ID: 10978047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [3D-CT angiography and duplex sonography compared to arteriography in carotid stenoses].
Link J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Wesner F; Höpfner M; Schwarzenberg H; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Jan; 166(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9072101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.
Marks MP; Napel S; Jordan JE; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 8498231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with three-dimensional CT angiography and surgical revascularization].
Ohtaki M; Tanabe S; Uede T; Hashi K
No Shinkei Geka; 1996 Nov; 24(11):995-1002. PubMed ID: 8934467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT angiography of the common carotid artery bifurcation: comparison between two techniques and conventional angiography.
Castillo M; Wilson JD
Neuroradiology; 1994 Nov; 36(8):602-4. PubMed ID: 7862273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Non-invasive assessment of epiaortic vessels. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography with gadolinium, spiral computerized tomography angiography, and digital angiography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Pocek M; Fasoli F; Garaci FG; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):48-53. PubMed ID: 11360753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Work in progress.
Schwartz RB; Jones KM; Chernoff DM; Mukherji SK; Khorasani R; Tice HM; Kikinis R; Hooton SM; Stieg PE; Polak JF
Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):513-9. PubMed ID: 1410365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Rotational digital subtraction angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis].
Biederer J; Link J; Peter D; Kopp U; Heller M
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 10598163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection and assessment of circle of Willis aneurysms in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage with three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography: correlation with digital substraction angiography findings.
Lai PH; Yang CF; Pan HB; Chen C; Ho JT; Hsu SS
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Oct; 98(10):672-7. PubMed ID: 10575836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical value of methods to measure carotid stenosis.
Bladin CF; Alexandrova NA; Murphy J; Alexandrov AV; Maggisano R; Norris JW
Int Angiol; 1996 Dec; 15(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 9127768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
