155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9718481)
21. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients.
Imhoff M; Lehner JH; Löhlein D
Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2812-8. PubMed ID: 10966255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.
Ng HW; Coleman N; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM; Breckenridge AM
Clin Intensive Care; 1993; 4(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 10146700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. A preliminary report.
Masaki DI; Greenspoon JS; Ouzounian JG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Sep; 161(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 2782352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography.
Marik PE; Pendelton JE; Smith R
Crit Care Med; 1997 Sep; 25(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 9295830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery.
Sageman WS; Riffenburgh RH; Spiess BD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2002 Feb; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11854871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement.
Hirschl MM; Kittler H; Woisetschläger C; Siostrzonek P; Staudinger T; Kofler J; Oschatz E; Bur A; Gwechenberger M; Laggner AN
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 10890622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure.
Leslie SJ; McKee S; Newby DE; Webb DJ; Denvir MA
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Oct; 9(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 15472501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ
Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Agreement of cardiac output measurement between pulse contour analysis and thermodilution in various body positions: a porcine study.
Shih PC; Hung YC; Chen YL; Tsai HJ; Chen CY; Huang CJ
J Surg Res; 2013 May; 181(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 22884452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac index and ejection fraction in ischemic heart disease. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance, thermodilution and cineventriculography].
Talarico G; Saino A; Lotto A
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1992 Jun; 40(6):203-9. PubMed ID: 1407614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.
Northridge DB; Findlay IN; Wilson J; Henderson E; Dargie HJ
Br Heart J; 1990 Feb; 63(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 2317415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.
Fellahi JL; Fischer MO; Rebet O; Massetti M; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Apr; 26(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 21880510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of bioimpedance and thermodilution methods for determining cardiac output: experimental and clinical studies.
Spinale FG; Reines HD; Crawford FA
Ann Thorac Surg; 1988 Apr; 45(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3355284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Esophageal electrodes allow precise assessment of cardiac output by bioimpedance.
Balestra B; Malacrida R; Leonardi L; Suter P; Marone C
Crit Care Med; 1992 Jan; 20(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 1729048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of impedance cardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Panagiotou M; Vogiatzis I; Jayasekera G; Louvaris Z; Mackenzie A; Mcglinchey N; Baker JS; Church AC; Peacock AJ; Johnson MK
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Mar; 38(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 28168802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
