These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9718964)
1. Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity. Scialfa CT; Joffe KM Percept Psychophys; 1998 Aug; 60(6):1067-82. PubMed ID: 9718964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the link between attentional search and the oculomotor system: Is preattentive search restricted to the range of eye movements? Casteau S; Smith DT Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):518-532. PubMed ID: 31942703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The eyes prefer targets nearby fixation: Quantifying eccentricity-dependent attentional biases in oculomotor selection. van Heusden E; Olivers CNL; Donk M Vision Res; 2023 Apr; 205():108177. PubMed ID: 36669432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The zone of focal attention during active visual search. Motter BC; Belky EJ Vision Res; 1998 Apr; 38(7):1007-22. PubMed ID: 9666983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eye-head coordination and the variation of eye-movement accuracy with orbital eccentricity. Stahl JS Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jan; 136(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 11206282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probabilistic modeling of eye movement data during conjunction search via feature-based attention. Rutishauser U; Koch C J Vis; 2007 Apr; 7(6):5. PubMed ID: 17685788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: feature and conjunction searches. Carrasco M; Giordano AM; McElree B Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2028-40. PubMed ID: 16481020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search? Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The nature of the global effect beyond the first eye movement. Silvis JD; Olmos Solis K; Donk M Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():20-32. PubMed ID: 25584424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why do we move our head to look at an object in our peripheral region? Lateral viewing interferes with attentive search. Nakashima R; Shioiri S PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92284. PubMed ID: 24647634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New insights into feature and conjunction search: I. Evidence from pupil size, eye movements and ageing. Porter G; Tales A; Troscianko T; Wilcock G; Haworth J; Leonards U Cortex; 2010 May; 46(5):621-36. PubMed ID: 19591979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The eccentricity effect: target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Carrasco M; Evert DL; Chang I; Katz SM Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1241-61. PubMed ID: 8539099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Motter BC; Belky EJ Vision Res; 1998 Jun; 38(12):1805-15. PubMed ID: 9797959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect. Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial attention and latencies of saccadic eye movements. Clark JJ Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(3):585-602. PubMed ID: 10341987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]