190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9719256)
21. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade.
Yanke BV; Lallas CD; Pagnani C; McGinnis DE; Bagley DH
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18707717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of crossing vessels in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Clinical patterns and imaging findings.
Weiss DA; Kadakia S; Kurzweil R; Srinivasan AK; Darge K; Shukla AR
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Aug; 11(4):173.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26071850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience.
Boylu U; Oommen M; Lee BR; Thomas R
J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1751-5. PubMed ID: 19233419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: 10 years' experience in one institution.
Sheu JC; Koh CC; Chang PY; Wang NL; Tsai JD; Tsai TC
Pediatr Surg Int; 2006 Jun; 22(6):519-23. PubMed ID: 16736221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The incidence of crossing vessels in patients with normal ureteropelvic junction examined with endoluminal ultrasound.
Zeltser IS; Liu JB; Bagley DH
J Urol; 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2304-7. PubMed ID: 15538254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Management of the failed pyeloplasty.
Lim DJ; Walker RD
J Urol; 1996 Aug; 156(2 Pt 2):738-40. PubMed ID: 8683772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Functional assessment of crossing vessels as etiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Stern JM; Park S; Anderson JK; Landman J; Pearle M; Cadeddu JA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1022-4. PubMed ID: 17572178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Bägli DJ; Keays M; Farhat WA; Khoury AE; Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1684-7; discussion 1687-8. PubMed ID: 18708226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Differences between intrinsic and extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction related to crossing vessels: histology and functional analyses.
Ellerkamp V; Kurth RR; Schmid E; Zundel S; Warmann SW; Fuchs J
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 26219514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The value of colour Doppler ultrasonography for identification of crossing vessels in children with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Veyrac C; Baud C; Lopez C; Couture A; Saguintaah M; Averous M
Pediatr Radiol; 2003 Nov; 33(11):745-51. PubMed ID: 13680016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children by polar vessels. Is laparoscopic vascular hitching procedure a good solution? Single center experience on 35 consecutive patients.
Chiarenza SF; Bleve C; Fasoli L; Battaglino F; Bucci V; Novek S; Zolpi E
J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Feb; 51(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 26522896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Helical (spiral) CT angiography for identification of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction.
Quillin SP; Brink JA; Heiken JP; Siegel CL; McClennan BL; Clayman RV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1125-30. PubMed ID: 8615256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nature of crossing vessels in patients with radiographically normal ureteropelvic junctions: prevalence and anatomic characteristics.
Leavitt DA; Nicholson AF; Ortiz-Alvarado O; Maust TJ; Rutledge GM; Walker SP; Dunn TB; Anderson JK
Urology; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1168-72. PubMed ID: 23726444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Crossing renal vessel causing ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Mishra A
Saudi Med J; 2006 Sep; 27(9):1415-7. PubMed ID: 16951786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Capello SA; Kogan BA; Giorgi LJ; Kaufman RP
J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 1):1425-8. PubMed ID: 16145455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of crossing vessels in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction by means of helical CT.
Mitsumori A; Yasui K; Akaki S; Togami I; Joja I; Hashimoto H; Kumon H; Hiraki Y
Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1383-93; discussion 1393-5. PubMed ID: 10992027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Presentation, Management and Long-Term Outcome of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Duplex Kidneys.
Rubenwolf P; Ziesel C; Beetz R; Kamal MM; Thüroff JW; Stein R
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 25640647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Nagai A; Nasu Y; Hashimoto H; Tsugawa M; Yasui K; Kumon H
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11125355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Histopathology in Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction With and Without Crossing Vessels.
Cancian M; Pareek G; Caldamone A; Aguiar L; Wang H; Amin A
Urology; 2017 Sep; 107():209-213. PubMed ID: 28526243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
