BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9719781)

  • 1. Risk adjustment: where are we now?
    Newhouse JP
    Inquiry; 1998; 35(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 9719781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Policy implications of risk selection in Medicare HMOs: is the federal payment rate too high?
    Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 1996 Nov; (4):1-7. PubMed ID: 10539724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prepare now by learning the ABCs of PIP-DCGs (principal inpatient diagnostic cost groups).
    Public Sect Contract Rep; 1998 Jun; 4(6):86-7. PubMed ID: 10180643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can managed care save Medicare? Achieving high quality and low costs through managed care.
    Giffin R
    Manag Care Q; 1996; 4(4):12-29. PubMed ID: 10162547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.
    Ettner SL; Frank RG; McGuire TG; Hermann RC
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Aug; 36(4):793-811. PubMed ID: 11508640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biased enrollment of Medicare beneficiaries in HMO plans--implications for Medicare costs.
    Khan MM; Tsai WC; Kung PT
    J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(4):43-57. PubMed ID: 12148663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New capitation scenarios for HMO Medicare risk contracting.
    Grimaldi PL
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Feb; 51(2):35-6, 38. PubMed ID: 10164874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discretionary hospital use and diagnostic risk adjustment of Medicare HMO capitation rates.
    Porell FW; Gruenberg L
    Inquiry; 2000; 37(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 10985110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Getting ready for capitation: prepare, prepare, prepare.
    Johnson MD; Morrison M
    J Healthc Resour Manag; 1995 Sep; 13(9):26, 29-31. PubMed ID: 10151195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Service-level selection by HMOs in Medicare.
    Cao Z; McGuire TG
    J Health Econ; 2003 Nov; 22(6):915-31. PubMed ID: 14604553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicare home health reimbursement alternatives: access, quality, and cost incentives.
    Schlenker RE; Shaughnessy PW
    Home Health Care Serv Q; 1992; 13(1-2):91-115. PubMed ID: 10126434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paying for quality not quantity: a wisconsin health maintenance organization proposes an incentive model for reimbursement of chiropractic services.
    Pursel KJ; Jacobson M; Stephenson K
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 22926019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Don't flirt with disaster when it comes to stop loss.
    Public Sect Contract Rep; 1997 Dec; 3(12):177-81. PubMed ID: 10176063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structural incentives and adoption of medical technologies in HMO and fee-for-service health insurance plans.
    Ramsey SD; Pauly MV
    Inquiry; 1997; 34(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 9349247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conducting research on the Medicare market: the need for better data and methods.
    Wong HS; Hellinger FJ
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Apr; 36(1 Pt 2):291-308. PubMed ID: 11327178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does competition by health maintenance organizations affect the adoption of cost-containment measures by fee-for-service plans?
    Joesch JM; Wickizer TM; Feldstein PJ
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Jun; 4(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 10181069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reforming the primary care physician payment system: eliminating E & M codes and creating the financial incentives for an "advanced medical home".
    Goldfield N; Averill R; Vertrees J; Fuller R; Mesches D; Moore G; Wasson JH; Kelly W
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 18162792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.
    Atkinson G; Murray R
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medicare capitation payments: a critical analysis.
    Rosko MD
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 11(3):367-83. PubMed ID: 10303346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.