These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9720100)

  • 21. A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R; Persson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Nov; 77(8):560-565. PubMed ID: 31146623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal.
    Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 12820852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.
    Han GS; Cheng JG; Li G; Ma XC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130265. PubMed ID: 24005060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed photofluorographic panoramic system with conventional panoramic radiography.
    Nagata Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 11420624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dental digital radiography.
    Moore WS
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.
    Ramesh A; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11313729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detectability of normal anatomy in digital panoramic radiographs.
    Gross H; Nilsson M; Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 25771652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An update on dental imaging.
    Whaites E; Brown J
    Br Dent J; 1998 Aug; 185(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9769550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate.
    Wörtche R; Hassfeld S; Lux CJ; Müssig E; Hensley FW; Krempien R; Hofele C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 16549435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of the reproducibility of the gray values and noise of a direct digital radiography system.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Teixeira RC; Capelozza AL; Rubira-Bullen IR
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26017488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Low-dosage dental CT].
    Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Hohn HP; Rustemeyer R; Eich HT; John-Mikolajewski V; Müller RD
    Rofo; 1999 Aug; 171(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10506887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shall I go digital?
    Thomas BL; Davies J; Whaites E
    Dent Update; 2014 May; 41(4):314-6, 319-22, 325-6. PubMed ID: 24930253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the different exposure parameters for the accurate diagnosis of peri-implantitis severity in digital panoramic radiography.
    Sadik E; Gökmenoğlu C; Altun G; Kara C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Jan; 28(1):e16-e24. PubMed ID: 36565217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
    Wenman A; Lockwood P
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Absorbed dose reduced by sliced exposure using sector selector system with rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8620590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Image salvage in panoramic radiography using histogram optimization.
    Ogawa M; Tanimoto K; Kodera Y; Suei Y; Taguchi A; Tomita S; Furuki Y; Fujita M; Wada T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 1936424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.