These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9720100)

  • 41. [Detectability of intra-osseous lesions of jaws with computed panoramic radiography].
    Hirayama Y
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jun; 61(2):290-308. PubMed ID: 7930821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Initial evaluation of linear and spatially oriented planar images from a new dental panoramic system based on tomosynthesis.
    Katsumata A; Ogawa K; Inukai K; Matsuoka M; Nagano T; Nagaoka H; Yamakawa T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21827959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
    Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Panoramic radiography: digital technology fosters efficiency.
    Benson BW; Liang H; Flint DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011; 32 Spec No 4():6-8. PubMed ID: 22195340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effective dose reduction using collimation function in digital panoramic radiography and possible clinical implications in dentistry.
    Benchimol D; Koivisto J; Kadesjö N; Shi XQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20180007. PubMed ID: 29722543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pixel intensity and fractal analyses: detecting osteoporosis in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women by using digital panoramic images.
    Tosoni GM; Lurie AG; Cowan AE; Burleson JA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 16876068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A clinical evaluation of some factors affecting image quality in panoramic radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Axmann-Krcmar D; Reuter I; Meyle J; Gómez-Román G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 10808220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of zoomed digital image in the detection of periodontal bone defect: in vitro study.
    de Morais JA; Sakakura CE; Loffredo LC; Scaf G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16618844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Guide to Digital Radiographic Imaging.
    Mol A; Yoon DC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):503-11. PubMed ID: 26820007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical and in vitro film quality comparison of manual and automatic exposure control in panoramic radiography.
    Eraso FE; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Tyndall D; Phillips C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Apr; 87(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 10225638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study.
    Funama Y; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Kakei K; Nagasue N; Shimamura M; Sato N; Sultana S; Morishita S; Yamashita Y
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):905-10. PubMed ID: 16237139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography.
    Aufrichtig R; Xue P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2653-69. PubMed ID: 11008963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.