126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9720103)
1. A sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision and Fuji Super HR-S panoramic radiographic films.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kitagawa H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 9720103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A sensitometric comparison of Fuji Super HR-G and Kodak T-mat G panoramic films.
Benson BW; Frederiksen NL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 May; 79(5):646-8. PubMed ID: 7600231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
Farman TT; Farman AG
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kitagawa H; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.
Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Iwai K; Ejima K; Weinberg R
J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Jun; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1500950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resolution of several screen-film combinations in rotational panoramic radiography.
McDavid WD; Morris CR; Tronje G; Welander U
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 3459994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitometric and image analysis of T-grain film.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Aug; 62(2):218-20. PubMed ID: 3462620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality.
Braeuning MP; Cooper HW; O'Brien S; Burns CB; Washburn DB; Schell MJ; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70. PubMed ID: 10480042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A dual sensitivity screen system for TMJ image enhancement in cephalometric radiography: sensitometric evaluation.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K; Scarfe WC; Braun S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 8617394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Kodak T-Mat G film in rotational panoramic radiography.
Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 3459998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ortho cubic super-high resolution computed tomography: a new radiographic technique with application to the temporomandibular joint.
Honda K; Larheim TA; Johannessen S; Arai Y; Shinoda K; Westesson PL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 11174604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rare earth screens for panoramic radiography.
Hurlburt CE; Coggins LJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 6584845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinical comparison of image quality and patient exposure reduction in panoramic radiography with heavy metal filtration.
Kapa SF; Tyndall DA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 2740096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
