119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 972026)
1. The unwanted child: caring for the fetus born alive after an abortion.
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Oct; 6(5):10-5. PubMed ID: 972026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism.
Westerfield L
South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
Buckley M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Gestational burdens and fetal status: justifying Roe v. Wade.
Robertson JA
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):189-212. PubMed ID: 3333215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal experimentation: rights of the father and questions of personhood.
Wilson JP
Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):403-17. PubMed ID: 11664801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion--the breath of life.
Joling RJ
Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; 21(2):199-232. PubMed ID: 4613988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill.
Ruf BA
Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal politics: the debate on experimenting with the unborn.
Gaylin W; Lappé M
Atl Mon; 1975 May; 235(5):66-71. PubMed ID: 11663535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
Witherspoon JP
Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hyde and go seek: a response to Representative Hyde.
Pilpel HF
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1101-23. PubMed ID: 11651774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "A new Constitutional right": the Supreme Court and abortion.
De Borst J
Reform J; 1973 Apr; 23(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11663641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Can Congress create people?
Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H
Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal research, morality, & public policy.
McCormick RA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 1150415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000.
Arkes H
Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
