These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 972027)
1. Law and life sciences. Abortion and the Supreme Court: round two. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Oct; 6(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 972027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of state abortion laws enacted since January 1973. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):108-13. PubMed ID: 11664490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Teenagers and pregnancy: the law in 1979. Paul EW; Pilpel HF Fam Plann Perspect; 1979 Oct; 11(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 391587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States. Belling DW; Eberl C J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The 1983 abortion decisions: Virginia distinguished. Med Leg Bull; 1983; 32(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 6680764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative. Green W Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors. Scuder AC Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]