These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9721399)

  • 1. Comparison of the microbial barrier properties of a needleless and a conventional needle-based intravenous access system.
    Luebke MA; Arduino MJ; Duda DL; Dudar TE; McAllister SK; Bland LA; Wesley JR
    Am J Infect Control; 1998 Aug; 26(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 9721399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiologic evaluation of needleless and needle-access devices.
    Arduino MJ; Bland LA; Danzig LE; McAllister SK; Aguero SM
    Am J Infect Control; 1997 Oct; 25(5):377-80. PubMed ID: 9343619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap.
    Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 16418982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector.
    Casey AL; Worthington T; Lambert PA; Quinn D; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 12919759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preventing central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: development of an antiseptic barrier cap for needleless connectors.
    Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):S174.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19084153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Needleless connection valves--commentary from a clinical perspective].
    Simon A; Trautmann M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Feb; 133(5):206-8. PubMed ID: 18213555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Update: Catheter-related bloodstream infection rates in relation to clinical practice and needleless device type.
    Blake M
    Can J Infect Control; 2008; 23(3):156-60, 162. PubMed ID: 19024809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disinfection of needleless connectors with chlorhexidine-alcohol provides long-lasting residual disinfectant activity.
    Hong H; Morrow DF; Sandora TJ; Priebe GP
    Am J Infect Control; 2013 Aug; 41(8):e77-9. PubMed ID: 23394859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The potential for catheter microbial contamination from a needleless connector.
    Brown JD; Moss HA; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 1997 Jul; 36(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 9253699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Needleless connector know-how.
    Moureau NL; Dawson RB
    Nurs Manage; 2010 Dec; 41(12):40-1. PubMed ID: 21116154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the acceptability of a needleless vascular-access system by nurses.
    Ihrig M; Cookson ST; Campbell K; Hartstein AI; Jarvis WR
    Am J Infect Control; 1997 Oct; 25(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 9343631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevention of intravenous bacterial injection from health care provider hands: the importance of catheter design and handling.
    Loftus RW; Patel HM; Huysman BC; Kispert DP; Koff MD; Gallagher JD; Jensen JT; Rowlands J; Reddy S; Dodds TM; Yeager MP; Ruoff KL; Surgenor SD; Brown JR
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Nov; 115(5):1109-19. PubMed ID: 23051883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of adding 2% (w/v) chlorhexidine gluconate to 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to peripheral venous cannulation.
    Small H; Adams D; Casey AL; Crosby CT; Lambert PA; Elliott T
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 29(10):963-5. PubMed ID: 18771405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mixed-methods evaluation on the efficacy and perceptions of needleless connector disinfectants.
    Roberts SC; Hendrix CA; Edwards LM; Feinn RS; Martinello RA; Murray TS
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):230-233. PubMed ID: 35387702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The colonization rate of needleless connector and the impact of disinfection for 15 s on colonization: A prospective pre- and post-intervention study.
    Devrim İ; Demiray N; Oruç Y; Sipahi K; Çağlar İ; Sarı F; Turgut N; Atakul G; Özdamar N; Dursun V; Sorguç Y; Bayram N; Agın H
    J Vasc Access; 2019 Nov; 20(6):604-607. PubMed ID: 30722715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a needleless system with conventional heparin locks.
    Adams KS; Zehrer CL; Thomas W
    Am J Infect Control; 1993 Oct; 21(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 8267238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective clinical trial to evaluate the microbial barrier of a needleless connector.
    Casey AL; Burnell S; Whinn H; Worthington T; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2007 Mar; 65(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 17241691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective clinical study to investigate the microbial contamination ofa needleless connector.
    Seymour VM; Dhallu TS; Moss HA; Tebbs SE; Elliot TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2000 Jun; 45(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 10860694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a needleless intravenous access system.
    Yassi A; McGill ML; Khokhar JB
    Am J Infect Control; 1995 Apr; 23(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 7639404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods for microbial needleless connector decontamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flynn JM; Larsen EN; Keogh S; Ullman AJ; Rickard CM
    Am J Infect Control; 2019 Aug; 47(8):956-962. PubMed ID: 30824388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.