These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9721399)

  • 21. Comparison of contamination between conventional three-way stopcock and needleless injection device: a randomized controlled trial.
    Oto J; Nishimura M; Morimatsu H; Katayama H; Onodera M; Takahashi H; Takezawa J
    Med Sci Monit; 2007 Oct; 13(10):CR417-21. PubMed ID: 17901847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of universal disinfectant cap implementation on central line-associated bloodstream infections.
    Merrill KC; Sumner S; Linford L; Taylor C; Macintosh C
    Am J Infect Control; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1274-7. PubMed ID: 25465256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Disinfection of needleless connectors to reduce
    Rocha PK; Rickard CM; Gales AC; Sincero TCM; Ray-Barruel G; Ullman AJ; Dalcin CB; Pedreira MLG
    Br J Nurs; 2022 Oct; 31(19):S26-S31. PubMed ID: 36306235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scrubbing technique for needleless connectors to minimize contamination risk.
    Satou K; Kusanagi R; Nishizawa A; Hori S
    J Hosp Infect; 2018 Nov; 100(3):e200-e203. PubMed ID: 29574119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Keeping needleless connectors clean, part 1.
    Moureau NL; Dawson RB
    Nursing; 2010 May; 40(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 20386391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sterile v aseptic non-touch technique for needle-less connector care on central venous access devices in a bone marrow transplant population: A comparative study.
    Flynn JM; Keogh SJ; Gavin NC
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2015 Dec; 19(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 26059324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Calibration of optimal use parameters for an ultraviolet light-emitting diode in eliminating bacterial contamination on needleless connectors.
    Hutchens MP; Drennan SL; Cambronne ED
    J Appl Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 118(6):1298-305. PubMed ID: 25801979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study.
    Bouza E; Muñoz P; López-Rodríguez J; Jesús Pérez M; Rincón C; Martín Rabadán P; Sánchez C; Bastida E
    J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 12919758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Needle-free devices: keeping the system closed.
    Kelly LJ; Jones T; Kirkham S
    Br J Nurs; 2017 Jan; 26(2):S14-S19. PubMed ID: 28132546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determination of microbial contamination on the outer surface of needleless connectors before and after disinfection.
    Akbıyık A; Kaya S; Aksun M
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2023 Aug; 77():103414. PubMed ID: 36801154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Needleless connectors for IV catheters.
    Hadaway L
    Am J Nurs; 2012 Nov; 112(11):32-44; quiz 45. PubMed ID: 23075549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Study of a needleless intermittent intravenous-access system for peripheral infusions: analysis of staff, patient, and institutional outcomes.
    Mendelson MH; Short LJ; Schechter CB; Meyers BR; Rodriguez M; Cohen S; Lozada J; DeCambre M; Hirschman SZ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1998 Jun; 19(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 9669621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro comparison of microbial ingress into 8 different needleless IV access devices.
    Casey A; Karpanen T; Nightingale P; Elliott T
    J Infus Nurs; 2015; 38(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 25545971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The benefits and limitations of needle protectors and needleless intravenous systems.
    Orenstein R
    J Intraven Nurs; 1999; 22(3):122-8. PubMed ID: 10640075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do needleless intravenous systems increase the risk of infection?
    Hanchett M; Kung LY
    J Intraven Nurs; 1999; 22(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 10640074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gram-negative bloodstream infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: the roles of needleless device use, bathing practices, and catheter care.
    Toscano CM; Bell M; Zukerman C; Shelton W; Novicki TJ; Nichols WG; Corey L; Jarvis WR
    Am J Infect Control; 2009 May; 37(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 19406332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related bloodstream infections.
    Btaiche IF; Kovacevich DS; Khalidi N; Papke LF
    Am J Infect Control; 2011 May; 39(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 21256629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Infection risks associated with needleless intravenous access devices.
    Casey AL; Elliott TS
    Nurs Stand; 2007 Nov; 22(11):38-44. PubMed ID: 18075022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Keeping i.v. therapy safe with needleless systems.
    Rosenthal K
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2003 Oct; Suppl():16-8, 20. PubMed ID: 14694862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The usability and acceptability of a needleless connector system.
    Casey AL; Elliott TS
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Mar 8-21; 16(5):267-71. PubMed ID: 17505370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.