These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9722096)

  • 21. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
    Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of a composite inlay system.
    Scott JA; Saunders WP; Strang R
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 1290604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An In-VitroEvaluation of Microleakage at the Cervical Margin Between two Different Class II Restorative Techniques Using Dye Penetration Method.
    Jawaed NU; Abidi SY; Qazi FU; Ahmed S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Sep; 26(9):748-52. PubMed ID: 27671178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Başeren M; Dayangaç B
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 12553620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of different cementation techniques in Class V ceramic inlays.
    Ozturk AN; Ozturk B; Aykent F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1192-6. PubMed ID: 15544655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal integrity and microleakage of direct and indirect composite inlays: SEM and stereomicroscopic evaluation.
    Soares CJ; Celiberto L; Dechichi P; Fonseca RB; Martins LR
    Braz Oral Res; 2005; 19(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 16491259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sealing ability of packable resin composites in class II restorations.
    Fabianelli A; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 14621243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents.
    Alavi AA; Kianimanesh N
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11817466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of occlusal finish line configuration on microleakage of indirect composite inlays.
    Peixoto RT; Poletto LT; Lanza MD; Buono VT
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 12236643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.