These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9722753)
21. Ureteral reaction to suture material. Smith MW; Bartone FF; Tan EC; Gardner PJ Urology; 1983 Mar; 21(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 6301130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of the pH and the urine infected by Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis on chromic catgut, polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910: study in vitro. Hering FL; Rosenberg D; Chade J Urol Int; 1989; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 2552634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery. Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Suture material in urology]. Pereverzev AS; Rossikhin VV; Moiseev AV; Mys'ko SIa; Dzhunedzha KK Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1997; (4):36-9. PubMed ID: 9381621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative study of poly(glycolic acid) and catgut as suture materials. Histomorphology and mechanical properties. Pavan A; Bosio M; Longo T J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 May; 13(3):477-96. PubMed ID: 155699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of bacteria on absorbable sutures. Williams DF J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 6245093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of the effect of pH on the biodegradation of two synthetic absorbable sutures. Chu CC Ann Surg; 1982 Jan; 195(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 6275809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Question of the month (catgut sutures)]. Spauwen PH Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Feb; 107(2):76. PubMed ID: 11409385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of saline conditions on the tensile strength of ophthalmic sutures. Brauner SC; Berry JL; Pye J; Lee EG; Rhee DJ Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 21117584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Common bile duct healing. Do different absorbable sutures affect stricture formation and tensile strength? Sharp KW; Ross CB; Tillman VN; Dunn JF Arch Surg; 1989 Apr; 124(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 2930349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. Gerber C; Schneeberger AG; Beck M; Schlegel U J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 May; 76(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 8175836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective clinical evaluation of the longevity of resorbable sutures in oral mucosa. Shaw RJ; Negus TW; Mellor TK Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Jun; 34(3):252-4. PubMed ID: 8818261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of suture materials for intestinal anastomosis. Bornemissza G; Szentkereszty B; Furka I; Mikó I Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung; 1979; 20(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 233395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Running sutures anchored with square knots are unreliable. Aanning HL; Van Osdol A; Allamargot C; Becker BE; Howard TC; Likness ML; Merkwan CE; Tarver DD Am J Surg; 2012 Sep; 204(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 22494881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]