These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. [Effect of surgical conization of the uterine cervix followed by electrocoagulation on the activation of latent trichomonas vaginitis]. Pilawski Z; Uzar A; Kośmider M Wiad Parazytol; 1977; 23(5):601-3. PubMed ID: 607574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report. Luesley D; Downey G J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Cervical pathology: significance and therapeutic impact of margin status]. Michy T; Leveque J; Loussouarn D; Dravet F; Dejode M; Sagan C; Descamps P; Classe JM Bull Cancer; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1171-5. PubMed ID: 19091650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The relationship between pain and uterine contractions during laser vaporization of the cervix. Julian TM; O'Connell BJ; Gosewehr JA Obstet Gynecol; 1992 May; 79(5 ( Pt 1)):689-92. PubMed ID: 1565349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid in cervical cancer screening: a comparison with cervical cytology. Akinola OI; Fabamwo AO; Oshodi YA; Banjo AA; Odusanya O; Gbadegesin A; Tayo A J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 17999297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of cervical disease history on outcomes of women who have a pap diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Raab SS; Bishop NS; Zaleski MS Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep; 74(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 10479510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear? Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears. Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical cancer diagnosed after simple hysterectomy for persistent abnormal cervical smears: a clinical dilemma. Pisal N; Sindos M; Freeman-Wang T; Ramchandra S; Michala S; Singer A J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Feb; 24(2):186-7. PubMed ID: 14766469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The importance of cryosurgery in gynecological practice. Wojciech R Ginekol Pol; 2011 Aug; 82(8):618-22. PubMed ID: 21957608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening. Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. HPV triage testing or repeat Pap smear for the management of atypical squamous cells (ASCUS) on Pap smear: is there evidence of process utility? Howard K; Salkeld G; McCaffery K; Irwig L Health Econ; 2008 May; 17(5):593-605. PubMed ID: 17764095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women. Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]