These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. High performance liquid chromatography cyclosporine monitoring: a predictor of renal graft outcome. Cicciarelli J; Avila D; Iwaki Y; Sather H; Mendez R Transplant Proc; 1998 Aug; 30(5):1683-4. PubMed ID: 9723243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of variability of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics on long-term renal allograft survival. Markell MS; Homel P; Sumrani N; Hong JH; Distant DA; Miles AM; Sommer BG; Friedman EA Transplant Proc; 1998 Aug; 30(5):1980-2. PubMed ID: 9723360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Low exposure to cyclosporine is a risk factor for the occurrence of chronic rejection after kidney transplantation. Citterio F; Torricelli P; Serino F; Foco M; Pozzetto U; Fioravanti P; Castagneto M Transplant Proc; 1998 Aug; 30(5):1688-90. PubMed ID: 9723245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abbreviated cyclosporine pharmacokinetic profiling in clinical renal transplantation: from principles to practice. Vathsala A; Lu YM Transplant Proc; 2001; 33(7-8):3137-9. PubMed ID: 11750348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Greater variability of dose-corrected cyclosporine C2 concentrations in renal recipients with acute rejection. Chueh SC; Liao CH; Lai MK Transplant Proc; 2003 Feb; 35(1):234-5. PubMed ID: 12591378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between maintenance dose of cyclosporine and long-term kidney graft survival. Collaborative Transplant Study. Opelz G Transplant Proc; 1998 Aug; 30(5):1716-7. PubMed ID: 9723253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Time-dependent difference of the 12-hour trough levels of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients with sandimmune capsule. To H; Haba T; Uchida K; Fujimura A; Kobayashi E Transplant Proc; 2000 Feb; 32(1):221-2. PubMed ID: 10701028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral in renal transplant: functional histopathological, and pharmacokinetic changes. Roessler E; Herrera S; Espinoza M; Ayala A; Reynolds E; González F; Espinoza O; Undurraga A; Muñoz R; Arcos O; Galaz G Transplant Proc; 1998 Aug; 30(5):1756-7. PubMed ID: 9723268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Acute allograft rejection following conversion to a new cyclosporine formulation in pediatric renal transplant patients. Crocker J; Renton K; Wade A; McLellan H; Acott P Transplant Proc; 1998 Aug; 30(5):2002-5. PubMed ID: 9723369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A two-year study of the new cyclosporine formulation Consupren in de novo renal transplant patients. Stephan AG; Barbari A; Masri M; Kamel G; Barakat Khoury W; Karam A; Mokhbat J; Kilany H Transplant Proc; 1998 Nov; 30(7):3563-4. PubMed ID: 9838560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Renal recipients of haploidentical living donors treated with Neoral or conventional cyclosporine: a comparative follow-up of 3 years. Gracida C; Melchor JL Transplant Proc; 1998 Aug; 30(5):1742-3. PubMed ID: 9723262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmacokinetics and renal function after conversion from standard to microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients. Gaspari F; Anedda MF; Signorini O; Amuchastegui SC; Perico N; Remuzzi G Transplant Proc; 1998 Aug; 30(5):1654-5. PubMed ID: 9723229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Convenience of level of cyclosporine-Neoral at time 3 to determine the area under curve in renal transplant. Rial MC; Frias S; Argento J; Tessler J; Casadei D Transplant Proc; 1997; 29(1-2):292-3. PubMed ID: 9123001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]