BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9723765)

  • 1. Effects of relative levels of the primary tones on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Beattie RC; Jones RL
    Audiology; 1998; 37(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 9723765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical significance of relative probe-tone levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Rasmussen AN; Popelka GR; Osterhammel PA; Nielsen LH
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 8146586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of sample size on the noise floor and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Beattie RC; Ireland A
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 10888346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A research for basic properties of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects].
    Liu A; Cui Y; Huang H
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Oct; 12(10):435-8. PubMed ID: 11263229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human efferent adaptation of DPOAEs in the L1,L2 space.
    Meinke DK; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 208(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 16019174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans.
    Roede J; Harris FP; Probst R; Xu L
    Audiology; 1993; 32(5):273-81. PubMed ID: 8216026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hearing evaluation in chronic renal failure children].
    Hajduk A; Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Szprynger K; Szczepańska M; Widziszowska A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16821544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.
    Whitehead ML; Stagner BB; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2359-77. PubMed ID: 7714255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
    Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Average optimal DPOAE primary tone levels in normal-hearing adults.
    Marcrum SC; Kummer P; Kreitmayer C; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 27010374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss in humans: comparison of unequal- and equal-level stimuli.
    Sun XM; Jung MD; Kim DO; Randolph KJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1996 Dec; 105(12):982-90. PubMed ID: 8973286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPEs) in neonates: frequency ratio (F2/F1) and stimulus level differences (L1-L2).
    Quiñónez RE
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1999; 119(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 10445057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Garner CA; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):418-28. PubMed ID: 16454296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.