These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9723768)

  • 1. Effect of cochlear implantation on voice fundamental frequency in post-lingually deafened adults.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1998; 37(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 9723768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of cochlear implantation on nasality in post-lingually deafened adults.
    Langereis MC; Dejonckere PH; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(6):308-14. PubMed ID: 9415736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ambulatory Phonation Monitoring in Prelingual and Postlingual Deaf Patients after Cochlear Implantation.
    Albera A; Puglisi GE; Astolfi A; Riva G; Cassandro C; Mozzanica F; Canale A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 36195076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term effect of auditory feedback on fundamental frequency after cochlear implantation.
    Hamzavi J; Deutsch W; Baumgartner WD; Bigenzahn W; Gstoettner W
    Audiology; 2000; 39(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 10882049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intelligibility of vowels produced by post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1999; 38(4):206-24. PubMed ID: 10431907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implantation in early deafened, late implanted adults: Do they benefit?
    Kumar RS; Mawman D; Sankaran D; Melling C; O'Driscoll M; Freeman SM; Lloyd SK
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():22-5. PubMed ID: 27099106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB; McCleary EA; Carney AE; Schulte L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults and elderly patients: analysis of audiometric and speech perception outcomes during the first year of use.
    Ghiselli S; Nedic S; Montino S; Astolfi L; Bovo R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2016 Dec; 36(6):513-519. PubMed ID: 28177335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.
    Geurts L; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):713-26. PubMed ID: 11248975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
    Ebrahimi-Madiseh A; Eikelboom RH; Jayakody DM; Atlas MD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 26841858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change of phonation control after cochlear implantation.
    Hocevar-Boltezar I; Radsel Z; Vatovec J; Geczy B; Cernelc S; Gros A; Zupancic J; Battelino S; Lavrencak B; Zargi M
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 16791041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of partially restored hearing on speech production of postlingually deafened adults with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Taitelbaum R; Tobin Y; Hildesheimer M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2843-57. PubMed ID: 10573900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of pre-operative developmental delays on the speech perception of children with cochlear implants.
    Hiraumi H; Yamamoto N; Sakamoto T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Feb; 40(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 22727355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted prelingually deafened adults: changes in quality of life.
    Straatman LV; Huinck WJ; Langereis MC; Snik AF; Mulder JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 24448285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation in patients profoundly deafened after head injury.
    Khwaja S; Mawman D; Nichani J; Bruce I; Green K; Lloyd S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Oct; 33(8):1328-32. PubMed ID: 22935808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of cochlear implant performance.
    van Dijk JE; van Olphen AF; Langereis MC; Mens LH; Brokx JP; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 10206520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.