These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15068938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilaminar pattern of tibial condyle cartilage layer on the fat-suppressed 3D gradient echo images: artifact or structural and biochemical difference in composition of cartilage? Trattnig S; Mlynárik V; Jung B; Bader T; Sulzbacher I; Herneth A; Gaisch R; Puig S Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Feb; 19(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 11358656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of MR sequences in quantifying in vitro cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis of the knee. Uhl M; Allmann KH; Tauer U; Laubenberger J; Adler CP; Ihling C; Langer M Br J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 71(843):291-6. PubMed ID: 9616238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens]. Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificially produced cartilage lesions in small joints: detection with optimized MRI-sequences. Link TM; Lindner N; Haeussler M; Reimer P; Allkemper T; Jerosch J; Peterfy C; Majumdar S; Peters PE Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(8):949-56. PubMed ID: 9322214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging of knee osteoarthritis and correlation of findings with reported patient pain. Ai F; Yu C; Zhang W; Morelli JN; Kacher D; Li X J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2010 Apr; 30(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 20407883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective water excitation for faster MR imaging of articular cartilage defects: initial clinical results. Mohr A; Priebe M; Taouli B; Grimm J; Heller M; Brossmann J Eur Radiol; 2003 Apr; 13(4):686-9. PubMed ID: 12664103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid isotropic resolution cartilage assessment using radial alternating repetition time balanced steady-state free-precession imaging. Al saleh H; Hernandez L; Lee KS; Rosas HG; Block WF; Kijowski R J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 40(4):796-803. PubMed ID: 24151247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Articular cartilage: correlation of histologic zones with signal intensity at MR imaging. Modl JM; Sether LA; Haughton VM; Kneeland JB Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):853-5. PubMed ID: 1947110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental autologous osteochondral plug transfer in the treatment of focal chondral defects: magnetic resonance imaging signs of technical success in sheep. Uhl M; Lahm A; Bley TA; Haberstroh J; Mrosek E; Ghanem N; Erggelet C Acta Radiol; 2005 Dec; 46(8):875-80. PubMed ID: 16392613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The initial (I and II) and advanced (III and IV) stages of juvenile patellar chondromalacia. Its diagnosis by magnetic resonance using a 1.5-T magnet with FLASH sequences]. Macarini L; Rizzo A; Martino F; Zaccheo N; Angelelli G; Rotondo A Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 9717534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in knee joint: MR imaging and histologic features at 1-year follow-up. Tins BJ; McCall IW; Takahashi T; Cassar-Pullicino V; Roberts S; Ashton B; Richardson J Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):501-8. PubMed ID: 15616118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of cartilage surface injuries using 3D-double echo steady state (3D-DESS): effect of changing flip angle from 40° to 90°. Moriya S; Miki Y; Kanagaki M; Yamamoto A; Okudaira S; Nakamura S; Yokobayashi T; Ishikawa M Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1138-42. PubMed ID: 22042983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence. Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging. Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]