These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9725160)

  • 1. Should unipolar leads be implanted in the atrium? A Holter electrocardiographic comparison of threshold adapted unipolar and high sensitive bipolar sensing.
    Wiegand UK; Schier H; Bode F; Brandes A; Potratz J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Aug; 21(8):1601-8. PubMed ID: 9725160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and safety of bipolar sensing with high atrial sensitivity in dual chamber pacemakers.
    Wiegand UK; Bode F; Peters W; Haase H; Bonnemeier H; Katus HA; Potratz J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Apr; 23(4 Pt 1):427-33. PubMed ID: 10793429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unipolar sensing in contemporary pacemakers: using myopotential testing to define optimal sensitivity settings.
    Exner DV; Rothschild JM; Heal S; Gillis AM
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 9869994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of acute and long-term clinical performance of two single lead atrial synchronous ventricular (VDD) pacemakers: diagonally arranged bipolar versus closely spaced bipolar ring electrodes.
    Lau CP; Leung SK; Lee IS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1574-81. PubMed ID: 8946453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bipolar ventricular far-field signals in the atrium.
    Fröhlig G; Helwani Z; Kusch O; Berg M; Schieffer H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Nov; 22(11):1604-13. PubMed ID: 10598963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pacing and sensing disturbances in patients with DDD pacemakers in the early period after implantation.
    Wranicz JK; Chudzik M; Cygankiewicz I; Klimczak A; Kaczmarek K; Maciejewski M; Goch JH
    Acta Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 61(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 16869449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of programmed sensitivity safety factor on atrial sensing in children.
    Chiu CC; Gow RM; McCrindle BW; Hamilton RM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2163-70. PubMed ID: 9309739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical relevance of electromyopotential oversensing in current unipolar devices.
    Gross JN; Platt S; Ritacco R; Andrews C; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2023-7. PubMed ID: 1279592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. VDD(R) pacing: short- and long-term stability of atrial sensing with a single lead system.
    Naegeli B; Osswald S; Pfisterer M; Burkart F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 19(4 Pt 1):455-64. PubMed ID: 8848393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous daily variability of atrial sensitivity. A study with an implanted DDD pacemaker.
    Romanò M; Spinelli A; Grieco A
    Int J Cardiol; 2001 Feb; 77(2-3):287-91. PubMed ID: 11182194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combipolar sensing in dual chamber pacing: is there still a need for bipolar leads in the atrium?
    Linde C; Markewitz A; Strandberg H; Larsson B; Binner L; Schüller H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov; 24(11):1664-71. PubMed ID: 11816637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of an automatic sensing algorithm.
    Berg M; Fröhlig G; Schwerdt H; Becker R; Schieffer H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1880-5. PubMed ID: 1279564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of unipolar and bipolar active fixation atrial pacing leads.
    Kay GN; Epstein AE; Plumb VJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 May; 11(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 2456532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of myopotential interference in unipolar-bipolar programmable DDD pacemakers.
    Gabry MD; Behrens M; Andrews C; Wanliss M; Klementowicz PT; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Nov; 10(6):1322-30. PubMed ID: 2446279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous Holter telemetry of atrial electrograms and marker annotations using a common Holter recording system: impact on Holter electrocardiogram interpretation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers.
    Wiegand UK; Bonnemeier H; Bode F; Eberhardt F; Chun JK; Katus HA; Peters W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Dec; 25(12):1724-30. PubMed ID: 12520673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The current status of single lead dual chamber sensing and pacing.
    Tse HF; Lau CP
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 2(3):255-67. PubMed ID: 9870020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphology-enhanced atrial event classification improves sensing in pacemakers.
    Lewalter T; Tuininga Y; Fröhlig G; Remerie S; Eberhardt F; Schmidt J; van Groeningen C; Wohlgemuth P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1455-63. PubMed ID: 18070298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Atrial sensing by a new VDD pacemaker].
    Voigtländer T; Nowak B; Treese N; Poschmann G; Becker HJ; Meyer J
    Z Kardiol; 1995 Jun; 84(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 7653085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
    Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term follow-up of pacemakers with an Autocapture pacing system.
    Erdinler I; Akyol A; Okmen E; Oguz E; Gurkan K; Ulufer T
    Jpn Heart J; 2002 Nov; 43(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 12558127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.