179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9725595)
1. Calculation of the spatial variation of relative biological effectiveness in a therapeutic proton field for eye treatment.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2147-57. PubMed ID: 9725595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(5):747-64. PubMed ID: 11931469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beams using biological weighting functions.
Paganetti H; Olko P; Kobus H; Becker R; Schmitz T; Waligorski MP; Filges D; Müller-Gärtner HW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Feb; 37(3):719-29. PubMed ID: 9112472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Oct; 2(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 14529306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam.
Britten RA; Nazaryan V; Davis LK; Klein SB; Nichiporov D; Mendonca MS; Wolanski M; Nie X; George J; Keppel C
Radiat Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23148508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiobiological intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV proton therapy beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Wouters BG; Skarsgard LD; Gerweck LE; Carabe-Fernandez A; Wong M; Durand RE; Nielson D; Bussiere MR; Wagner M; Biggs P; Paganetti H; Suit HD
Radiat Res; 2015 Feb; 183(2):174-87. PubMed ID: 25587741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microdosimetric calculation of relative biological effectiveness for design of therapeutic proton beams.
Kase Y; Yamashita W; Matsufuji N; Takada K; Sakae T; Furusawa Y; Yamashita H; Murayama S
J Radiat Res; 2013 May; 54(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 23179376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interaction between the biological effects of high- and low-LET radiation dose components in a mixed field exposure.
Mason AJ; Giusti V; Green S; Munck af Rosenschöld P; Beynon TD; Hopewell JW
Int J Radiat Biol; 2011 Dec; 87(12):1162-72. PubMed ID: 21923301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of the beam modulation technique on dose and RBE in proton radiation therapy.
Paganetti H; Schmitz T
Phys Med Biol; 1996 Sep; 41(9):1649-63. PubMed ID: 8884903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calculation of biological effectiveness of SOBP proton beams: a TOPAS Monte Carlo study.
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 38377599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of proton pencil beam scanning and passive beam using a high spatial resolution solid-state microdosimeter.
Tran LT; Chartier L; Bolst D; Pogossov A; Guatelli S; Petasecca M; Lerch MLF; Prokopovich DA; Reinhard MI; Clasie B; Depauw N; Kooy H; Flanz JB; McNamara A; Paganetti H; Beltran C; Furutani K; Perevertaylo VL; Jackson M; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):6085-6095. PubMed ID: 28887837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness.
Carabe A; Moteabbed M; Depauw N; Schuemann J; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1159-72. PubMed ID: 22330133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break.
Wang CC; Hsiao Y; Lee CC; Chao TC; Wang CC; Tung CJ
Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21823821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical and biological impacts of collimator-scattered protons in spot-scanning proton therapy.
Ueno K; Matsuura T; Hirayama S; Takao S; Ueda H; Matsuo Y; Yoshimura T; Umegaki K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):48-57. PubMed ID: 31237090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative biological effectiveness variation along monoenergetic and modulated Bragg peaks of a 62-MeV therapeutic proton beam: a preclinical assessment.
Chaudhary P; Marshall TI; Perozziello FM; Manti L; Currell FJ; Hanton F; McMahon SJ; Kavanagh JN; Cirrone GA; Romano F; Prise KM; Schettino G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24986743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios.
Giovannini G; Böhlen T; Cabal G; Bauer J; Tessonnier T; Frey K; Debus J; Mairani A; Parodi K
Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():68. PubMed ID: 27185038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A phenomenological model for the relative biological effectiveness in therapeutic proton beams.
Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(13):2811-25. PubMed ID: 15285249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An initial systematic study of the linear energy transfer distributions of a proton beam under a transverse magnetic field.
Fujii Y; Ueda H; Umegaki K; Matsuura T
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1839-1852. PubMed ID: 35124798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical model estimation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beam therapy.
Chen Y; Ahmad S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 21593038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
