These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9725601)

  • 1. Calculation of backscatter factors for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo methods.
    Petoussi-Henss N; Zankl M; Drexler G; Panzer W; Regulla D
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2237-50. PubMed ID: 9725601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Backscatter factors for mammography calculated with Monte Carlo methods.
    Kramer R; Drexler G; Petoussi-Henss N; Zankl M; Regulla D; Panzer W
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Mar; 46(3):771-81. PubMed ID: 11277224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of phantom thickness and material on the backscatter factors for diagnostic x-ray beam dosimetry.
    Benmakhlouf H; Fransson A; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(2):247-60. PubMed ID: 23257169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system.
    Alnewaini Z; Langer E; Schaber P; David M; Kretz D; Steil V; Hesser J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28300387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measured and Monte Carlo simulated surface dose reduction for superficial X-rays incident on tissue with underlying air or bone.
    Baines J; Zawlodzka S; Markwell T; Chan M
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):926-933. PubMed ID: 29235131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of dose changes for therapeutic kilovoltage X-ray beams with underlying lead shielding.
    Hill R; Healy B; Holloway L; Baldock C
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3045-53. PubMed ID: 17822012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backscatter factors and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for diagnostic radiology dosimetry.
    Benmakhlouf H; Bouchard H; Fransson A; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7179-204. PubMed ID: 22024474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The Difference in Backscatter Factors of Diagnostic X-rays by the Difference in the Scattering Medium and in the Objective Dose].
    Kato H; Sakai K; Uchiyama M; Suzuki K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 72(10):1007-1014. PubMed ID: 27760900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mass-energy absorption coefficient and backscatter factor ratios for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Ma CM; Seuntjens JP
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jan; 44(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 10071880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of MOSFET dosimeters' calibration method on calibration factors and radiation doses measured with the dosimeters in radiology.
    Happonen E; Husso M; Matikka H
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Apr; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 35354122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward automated and personalized organ dose determination in CT examinations - A comparison of two tissue characterization models for Monte Carlo organ dose calculation with a Therapy Planning System.
    Källman HE; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 30582891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo calculation for microplanar beam radiography.
    Company FZ; Allen BJ; Mino C
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Sep; 23(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 11210159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo studies of x-ray scattering in transmission diagnostic radiology.
    Barnea G; Dick CE
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 3736507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical validation of UF-RIPSA: A rapid in-clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions.
    Borrego D; Marshall EL; Tran T; Siragusa DA; Bolch WE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):343-350. PubMed ID: 29577612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limiting values of backscatter factors for low-energy x-ray beams.
    Patrocinio HJ; Bissonnette JP; Bussière MR; Schreiner LJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Feb; 41(2):239-53. PubMed ID: 8746107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of entrance surface dose calculations for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations and radiotherapy dosimetry formalisms.
    Omrane LB; Verhaegen F; Chahed N; Mtimet S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1809-24. PubMed ID: 12870585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface dosimetry for oblique tangential photon beams: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18293563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.