These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9726298)

  • 1. Augmentation of anterior transvertebral screws using threaded teflon anchoring.
    Korovessis PG; Deligianni D; Stamatakis M; Missirlis Y
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Aug; 11(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 9726298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
    Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
    Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
    Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do you do when you have a loose screw?
    Brady PC; Arrigoni P; Burkhart SS
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Sep; 22(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 16952719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct.
    DiPaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 17607102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae.
    Lill CA; Schneider E; Goldhahn J; Haslemann A; Zeifang F
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Dec; 126(10):686-94. PubMed ID: 16865403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior fixation in the osteoporotic spine: cut-out and pullout characteristics of implants.
    Ferguson SJ; Winkler F; Nolte LP
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 12522709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of end screw orientation on the stability of anterior instrumentation in cyclic lateral bending.
    Rodríguez-Olaverri JC; Hasharoni A; DeWal H; Nuzzo RM; Kummer FJ; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 16153585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A biomechanical study of top screw pullout in anterior scoliosis correction constructs.
    Mayo AE; Labrom RD; Askin GN; Adam CJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):E587-95. PubMed ID: 20461033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body.
    Tan JS; Bailey CS; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17268265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.
    Seller K; Wahl D; Wild A; Krauspe R; Schneider E; Linke B
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1047-54. PubMed ID: 17273838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of screw pullout rate on screw purchase in synthetic cancellous bone.
    Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):024501. PubMed ID: 19102576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
    Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength.
    Wittenberg RH; Lee KS; Shea M; White AA; Hayes WC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Nov; (296):278-87. PubMed ID: 8222439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs.
    Upasani VV; Farnsworth CL; Tomlinson T; Chambers RC; Tsutsui S; Slivka MA; Mahar AT; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19182704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
    Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
    Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.