BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9726908)

  • 1. Composition and susceptibility to chlorhexidine of multispecies biofilms of oral bacteria.
    Pratten J; Barnett P; Wilson M
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1998 Sep; 64(9):3515-9. PubMed ID: 9726908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization and application of a flow system for in vitro multispecies oral biofilm formation.
    Blanc V; Isabal S; Sánchez MC; Llama-Palacios A; Herrera D; Sanz M; León R
    J Periodontal Res; 2014 Jun; 49(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 23815431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental plaque bacteria with reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine are multidrug resistant.
    Saleem HG; Seers CA; Sabri AN; Reynolds EC
    BMC Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 16():214. PubMed ID: 27629863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antiplaque effect of essential oils and 0.2% chlorhexidine on an in situ model of oral biofilm growth: a randomised clinical trial.
    Quintas V; Prada-López I; Donos N; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Tomás I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117177. PubMed ID: 25689859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of Oral Multispecies Biofilms by an Anti-Biofilm Peptide.
    Wang Z; de la Fuente-Núñez C; Shen Y; Haapasalo M; Hancock RE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132512. PubMed ID: 26168273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oral biofilms exposure to chlorhexidine results in altered microbial composition and metabolic profile.
    Chatzigiannidou I; Teughels W; Van de Wiele T; Boon N
    NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2020 Mar; 6(1):13. PubMed ID: 32198347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-Velocity Microsprays Enhance Antimicrobial Activity in Streptococcus mutans Biofilms.
    Fabbri S; Johnston DA; Rmaile A; Gottenbos B; De Jager M; Aspiras M; Starke EM; Ward MT; Stoodley P
    J Dent Res; 2016 Dec; 95(13):1494-1500. PubMed ID: 27554642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antibacterial Efficacy of a Propolis Toothpaste and Mouthrinse Against a Supragingival Multispecies Biofilm.
    Vanni R; Waldner-Tomic NM; Belibasakis GN; Attin T; Schmidlin PR; Thurnheer T
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2015; 13(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 26106649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the effects of chlorhexidine on oral biofilm vitality and structure based on viability profiling and an indicator of membrane integrity.
    Hope CK; Wilson M
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2004 May; 48(5):1461-8. PubMed ID: 15105093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro studies of the effect of antiseptic-containing mouthwashes on the formation and viability of Streptococcus sanguis biofilms.
    Pratten J; Wills K; Barnett P; Wilson M
    J Appl Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 84(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 9717301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling oral malodour in a longitudinal study.
    Pratten J; Pasu M; Jackson G; Flanagan A; Wilson M
    Arch Oral Biol; 2003 Nov; 48(11):737-43. PubMed ID: 14550375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mouthwashes on the composition and metabolic activity of oral biofilms grown in vitro.
    Fernandez Y Mostajo M; Exterkate RAM; Buijs MJ; Crielaard W; Zaura E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 27337976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Susceptibility of Oral Streptococci to Chlorhexidine and Cetylpyridinium Chloride.
    So Yeon L; Si Young L
    Biocontrol Sci; 2019; 24(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 30880309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine against bacteria in biofilms at different stages of development.
    Shen Y; Stojicic S; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2011 May; 37(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 21496666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of biofilm maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to antibacterial agents.
    Stojicic S; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):473-7. PubMed ID: 23522539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro oral biofilm model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.
    Shapiro S; Giertsen E; Guggenheim B
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 12037365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antimicrobial efficacy of 0·05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouthrinses.
    Sreenivasan PK; Haraszthy VI; Zambon JJ
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2013 Jan; 56(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 23039819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chlorhexidine-induced ultrastructural alterations in oral biofilm.
    Vitkov L; Hermann A; Krautgartner WD; Herrmann M; Fuchs K; Klappacher M; Hannig M
    Microsc Res Tech; 2005 Oct; 68(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 16228984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method to study sustained antimicrobial activity of rinse and dentifrice components on biofilm viability in vivo.
    van der Mei HC; White DJ; Atema-Smit J; van de Belt-Gritter E; Busscher HJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 16367850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic killing effectiveness of mouthrinses and a d-enantiomeric peptide on oral multispecies biofilms grown on dental restorative material surfaces.
    Hu J; Yu J; Liu H; Wang Z; Haapasalo M; Haney EF; Hancock REW; Deng S; Shen Y
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104552. PubMed ID: 37201774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.