BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9727224)

  • 1. Organizational features affecting the use of coercion in the administration of psychiatric care.
    Cope KA; Encandela JA
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 1998 Jan; 25(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 9727224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary admissions and coercive measures in psychiatric care. Registered and reported.
    Kjellin L; Westrin CG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 9526713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of coercion in the admission of voluntary and involuntary psychiatric patients.
    Hoge SK; Lidz CW; Eisenberg M; Gardner W; Monahan J; Mulvey E; Roth L; Bennett N
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1997; 20(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 9178060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deprivation of liberty in psychiatric hospital care: the patient's perspective.
    Kuosmanen L; Hätönen H; Malkavaara H; Kylmä J; Välimäki M
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 Sep; 14(5):597-607. PubMed ID: 17901171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient perception of coercion on admission to acute psychiatric services. The New Zealand experience.
    McKenna BG; Simpson AI; Laidlaw TM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1999; 22(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 10224553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The benefits of voluntary inpatient psychiatric hospitalization: myth or reality?
    Stone DH
    Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1999; 9(1):25-52. PubMed ID: 16506327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in perceived coercion at admission to psychiatric hospitals in the Nordic countries.
    Kjellin L; Høyer G; Engberg M; Kaltiala-Heino R; Sigurjónsdóttir M
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 41(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 16424967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factual sources of psychiatric patients' perceptions of coercion in the hospital admission process.
    Lidz CW; Mulvey EP; Hoge SK; Kirsch BL; Monahan J; Eisenberg M; Gardner W; Roth LH
    Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Sep; 155(9):1254-60. PubMed ID: 9734551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlates of perceived coercion during psychiatric hospital admission.
    Cascardi M; Poythress NG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1997; 20(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 9436054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Psychiatric care and commitment of the mentally ill--a view held by private hospitals].
    Shirasawa H
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 1982; 84(11):868-74. PubMed ID: 7170313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Family, clinician, and patient perceptions of coercion in mental hospital admission. A comparative study.
    Hoge SK; Lidz CW; Eisenberg M; Monahan J; Bennett N; Gardner W; Mulvey EP; Roth L
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 9612714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity of mental patients' accounts of coercion-related behaviors in the hospital admission process.
    Lidz CW; Mulvey EP; Hoge SK; Kirsch BL; Monahan J; Bennett NS; Eisenberg M; Gardner W; Roth LH
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Aug; 21(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 9335194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental health. On the case.
    Gregory P
    Health Serv J; 2000 Mar; 110(5695):33. PubMed ID: 11067490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reaction to 'The judge follows the advice of the psychiatrist; an investigation into the jurisprudence concerning compulsory admission requests and decisions under the Dutch Act on Special Admissions to Psychiatric Hospitals (Bopz)].
    van der Heijden FM; Schlösser RHP
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2008; 50(12):840-1; author reply 841-2. PubMed ID: 19127510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of patient rights violations in psychiatric hospitals in Japan after the enactment of the Mental Health Act of 1987.
    Ohnishi K; Hayama Y; Kosugi S
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1290-303. PubMed ID: 19052946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The imminent peril in the law of July the fifth 2011, two years later: the impact on health?].
    Mondoloni A; Buard M; Nargeot J; Vacheron MN
    Encephale; 2014 Dec; 40(6):468-73. PubMed ID: 24703930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Italian psychiatry reform in the Piedmont region: Law no. 180 and its consequences].
    Becker T
    Psychiatr Prax; 1985 Jul; 12(4):136-42. PubMed ID: 4034809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary admission and treatment experiences of persons with schizophrenia: Implication for the Mental Health Care Bill 2016.
    Gowda GS; Kondapuram N; Kumar CN; Math SB
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2017 Oct; 29():3-7. PubMed ID: 29061422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The psychiatric care is charged with value conflicts. Unclear dividing-line between the voluntary and mandatory care].
    Ottosson JO
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(4):208-9. PubMed ID: 12580003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cooperative model between psychiatric hospitals aiming at quality management of coercive measures].
    Ketelsen R; Zechert C; Driessen M
    Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Apr; 34 Suppl 2():S208-11. PubMed ID: 17394112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.