These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9727247)

  • 1. Letters from the radiation oncologist: do referring doctors give a damn?
    Graham PH; Wilson G
    Australas Radiol; 1998 Aug; 42(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 9727247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncology service correspondence: do we communicate?
    Babington S; Wynne C; Atkinson CH; Hickey BE; Abdelaal AS
    Australas Radiol; 2003 Mar; 47(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 12581054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Writing to referring doctors after a new patient consultation. What is wanted and what was contained in letters from one medical oncologist?
    Tattersall MH; Griffin A; Dunn SM; Monaghan H; Scatchard K; Butow PN
    Aust N Z J Med; 1995 Oct; 25(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 8588768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care.
    McConnell D; Butow PN; Tattersall MH
    Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(3-4):427-37. PubMed ID: 10408849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving doctors' letters.
    Tattersall MH; Butow PN; Brown JE; Thompson JF
    Med J Aust; 2002 Nov; 177(9):516-20. PubMed ID: 12405897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Doctor-to-doctor communication of prognosis in metastatic cancer: a review of letters from medical oncologists to referring doctors.
    Moth EB; Parry J; Stockler MR; Beale P; Blinman P; Della-Fiorentina S; Kiely BE
    Intern Med J; 2015 Sep; 45(9):909-15. PubMed ID: 25851689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiotapes and letters to patients: the practice and views of oncologists, surgeons and general practitioners.
    McConnell D; Butow PN; Tattersall MH
    Br J Cancer; 1999 Apr; 79(11-12):1782-8. PubMed ID: 10206293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of problem lists in letters between hospital doctors and general practitioners.
    Lloyd BW; Barnett P
    BMJ; 1993 Jan; 306(6872):247. PubMed ID: 8507242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What do GPs want from a psychiatrist's letter?
    Selzer R; Foley F; Ellen S; McGartland M
    Australas Psychiatry; 2009; 17(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 20455799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review amongst restorative specialists on the quality of their communication with referring dental practitioners.
    Ricketts DN; Scott BJ; Ali A; Chadwick RG; Murray CA; Radford JR; Saunders WP
    Br Dent J; 2003 Oct; 195(7):389-93; discussion 383. PubMed ID: 14551631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quality and relationship of referral and reply letters. The effect of introducing a pro forma letter.
    Couper ID; Henbest RJ
    S Afr Med J; 1996 Dec; 86(12):1540-2. PubMed ID: 8998223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient attitudes to receiving copies of outpatient clinic letters from the ocular oncologist to the referring ophthalmologist and GP.
    Krishna Y; Damato BE
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Nov; 19(11):1200-4. PubMed ID: 15486567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter writing to parents following paediatric outpatient consultation: a survey of parent and GP views.
    Cowper DM; Lenton SW
    Child Care Health Dev; 1996 Sep; 22(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 8879755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychiatric referrals within the hospital--the communication process.
    Leonard I; Babbs C; Creed F
    J R Soc Med; 1990 Apr; 83(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 2342039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Referral letters in oral medicine: standard versus non-standard letters.
    Navarro CM; Miranda IA; Onofre MA; Sposto MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 31(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 12418571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Communication at the interface: do better referral letters produce better consultant replies?
    Grol R; Rooijackers-Lemmers N; van Kaathoven L; Wollersheim H; Mokkink H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Mar; 53(488):217-9. PubMed ID: 14694699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reply letters following orthodontic consultations: an audit of Merseyside general dental practitioners' satisfaction.
    Waring DT; Harrison JE
    Prim Dent Care; 2007 Apr; 14(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 17462137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective assessment of patient directed outpatient communication from a patient and general practitioner perspective.
    Mahadavan L; Bird NJ; Chadwick M; Daniels IR
    Postgrad Med J; 2009 Aug; 85(1006):395-8. PubMed ID: 19633003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of written reports provided by consultants in restorative dentistry to referring general dental practitioners in the west midlands.
    Saha S; Summerwill AJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Apr; 13(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 16608600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process in Latin America: a cross-sectional study on the use of clinical correspondence in public healthcare networks of six countries.
    Vargas I; Garcia-Subirats I; Mogollón-Pérez AS; Ferreira-de-Medeiros-Mendes M; Eguiguren P; Cisneros AI; Muruaga MC; Bertolotto F; Vázquez ML
    Health Policy Plan; 2018 May; 33(4):494-504. PubMed ID: 29452401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.