BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9728114)

  • 1. Cemented single crowns on osseointegrated implants after 5 years: results from a prospective study on CeraOne.
    Andersson B; Odman P; Lindvall AM; Brånemark PI
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 9728114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study.
    Andersson B; Taylor A; Lang BR; Scheller H; Schärer P; Sorensen JA; Tarnow D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 12066638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implants for single-tooth replacement. A clinical and experimental study on the Brånemark CeraOne System.
    Andersson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1995; 108():1-41. PubMed ID: 7644974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
    Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: results and experiences from a prospective study after 2 to 3 years.
    Andersson B; Odman P; Lindvall AM; Lithner B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):702-11. PubMed ID: 8530173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
    Turkyilmaz I; Avci M; Kuran S; Ozbek EN
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term follow-up of CeraOne™ single-implant restorations: an 18-year follow-up study based on a prospective patient cohort.
    Bergenblock S; Andersson B; Fürst B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 20586784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year prospective study of prosthodontic and surgical single-tooth implant treatment in general practices and at a specialist clinic.
    Andersson B; Odman P; Lindvall AM; Brånemark PI
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 9758999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A retrospective evaluation of 259 single-tooth replacements by the use of Brånemark implants.
    Scholander S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(6):483-91. PubMed ID: 10815600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
    Norton MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants.
    Krennmair G; Schmidinger S; Waldenberger O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 11858577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediately restored, single-tapered implants in the anterior maxilla: prosthodontic and aesthetic outcomes after 1 year.
    Hall JA; Payne AG; Purton DG; Torr B; Duncan WJ; De Silva RK
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 17362495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants.
    Norton MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 15101600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.
    Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study.
    Cardaropoli G; Lekholm U; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 16584412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Glauser R; Sailer I; Wohlwend A; Studer S; Schibli M; Schärer P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 16827738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.