These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Court and Webster: ethics, politics, and abortion--a panel discussion. Gomez CF; Howard AE; Pinkerton J; Childress JF Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 2247520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court backs states on abortion. Marwick C JAMA; 1989 Jul; 262(4):451-2. PubMed ID: 2739042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban. Preston J N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The law of human reproduction: an overview. Warren DG J Leg Med; 1982 Mar; 3(1):1-57. PubMed ID: 6979597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The convergence of abortion regulation in Germany and the United States: a critique of Glendon's Rights Talk thesis. Werner U Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1996 Jun; 18(3):571-602. PubMed ID: 11936151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions. Corns CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment? Walther KE Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Webster and the politics of abortion. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause. Looper-Friedman SE New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When does a fetus become a child in need of an advocate? Focusing on fetal pain. McDonald TB Child Leg Rights J; 1997; 17(2):12-9. PubMed ID: 12159907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Law, medicine, and the "gag rule". Ball JR Ann Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 115(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 1863032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]