110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9728678)
1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of thermal shock in a premolar with a composite resin MOD restoration.
Fenner DN; Robinson PB; Cheung PM
Med Eng Phys; 1998 Jun; 20(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 9728678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An investigation of temperature and stress distribution on a restored maxillary second premolar tooth using a three-dimensional finite element method.
Toparli M; Gökay N; Aksoy T
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Dec; 27(12):1077-81. PubMed ID: 11251781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A three-dimensional finite element model of the polymerization process in dental restorations.
Barink M; Van der Mark PC; Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Kreulen CM; Verdonschot N
Biomaterials; 2003 Apr; 24(8):1427-35. PubMed ID: 12527284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method.
Çelik Köycü B; İmirzalıoğlu P
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):460-473. PubMed ID: 26618930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach.
Lin CL; Chang CH; Ko CC
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 28(6):576-85. PubMed ID: 11422685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loading and composite restoration assessment of various non-carious cervical lesions morphologies - 3D finite element analysis.
Soares PV; Machado AC; Zeola LF; Souza PG; Galvão AM; Montes TC; Pereira AG; Reis BR; Coleman TA; Grippo JO
Aust Dent J; 2015 Sep; 60(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 25312697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites.
Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S
J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration.
Lin CL; Chang YH; Lin YF
J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):626-36. PubMed ID: 18550252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method.
Toparli M; Gökay N; Aksoy T
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10080314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conservative restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolar teeth: a FEM study.
Eraslan Ö; Eraslan O; Eskitaşcıoğlu G; Belli S
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 20238232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PCF; Queiroz EC; Araújo TC; Campos RE; Araújo CA; Soares CJ
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 17971112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of restorative procedures on endodontically treated premolars: Finite element analysis of a CT-scan based three-dimensional model.
Maravić T; Vasiljević D; Kantardžić I; Lainović T; Lužanin O; Blažić L
Dent Mater J; 2018 Jun; 37(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 29593161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.
Pereira FA; Zeola LF; de Almeida Milito G; Reis BR; Pereira RD; Soares PV
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 26159778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of interfacial failure around a class V composite restoration analysed by the finite element method.
Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 10672146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Asymptotic analysis of the stress field in adhering dental restorations.
Hübsch PF; Middleton J
J Biomech Eng; 2000 Aug; 122(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 11036565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
