BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9728723)

  • 1. Comparison of two digital hearing aids.
    Knebel SB; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Aug; 19(4):280-9. PubMed ID: 9728723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the performance of the Widex SENSO digital hearing aid with analog hearing aids.
    Valente M; Fabry DA; Potts LG; Sandlin RE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Oct; 9(5):342-60. PubMed ID: 9806408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical study of Widex Senso on first-time hearing aid users.
    Berninger E; Karlsson KK
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 10384899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.
    Ricketts T; Lindley G; Henry P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 11527041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationship to perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Cord MT; Leek MR; Walden BE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Oct; 11(9):475-83. PubMed ID: 11057731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a digital hearing aid with directional microphones in school-aged children.
    Kuk FK; Kollofski C; Brown S; Melum A; Rosenthal A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999; 10(10):535-48. PubMed ID: 10613350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different vibrant soundbridge audioprocessors with conventional hearing AIDS.
    Todt I; Seidl RO; Gross M; Ernst A
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Sep; 23(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 12218618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a full-digital in-the-ear hearing instrument.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA; Schoneveld P; Verschuure H
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 10206519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of hearing aids over the 20th century.
    Bentler RA; Duve MR
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):625-39. PubMed ID: 11132788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two digitally programmable hearing aids.
    Ricketts TA; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 1600212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open fitting: performance verification of receiver in the ear and receiver in the aid.
    Mondelli MF; Garcia TM; Hashimoto FM; Rocha AV
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 25382428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid.
    Arlinger S; Billermark E; Oberg M; Lunner T; Hellgren J
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 9505292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One year follow-up of users of a digital hearing aid.
    Arlinger S; Billermark E
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 10509857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hearing aids: objective and subjective evaluations of linear and nonlinear amplification users].
    Costa LP; IĆ³rio MC
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 16625868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of performance with frequency transposition hearing aids and conventional hearing aids.
    Parent TC; Chmiel R; Jerger J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Feb; 9(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 9493944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.