131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9728773)
1. Audiometry in general practice: validation of a pragmatic pure-tone audiometry method.
Karlsmose B; Pedersen HB; Lauritzen T; Parving A
Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 9728773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
Baldwin M; Watkin P
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry.
Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evoked otoacoustic emissions--an approach for monitoring cisplatin induced ototoxicity in children.
Stavroulaki P; Apostolopoulos N; Segas J; Tsakanikos M; Adamopoulos G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 May; 59(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 11376818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between hearing threshold measurements made with and without the aid of an ear speculum.
Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P; Bennrup S; Sheppard H
Audiology; 1983; 22(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 6651619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry in a group of school-aged children.
van Dijk C; Osman N
S Afr J Commun Disord; 2008; 55():29-36. PubMed ID: 19485067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pure tone audiometry: comparison of general practice and hospital services.
Smith MC; Cable HR; Wilmot JF
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Dec; 38(317):552-5. PubMed ID: 3267745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children.
Rahko-Laitila P; Karma P; Laippala P; Salmelin R; Sipilä M; Manninen M; Rahko T
Audiology; 2001; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can an average of thresholds at 2 kHz and 4 kHz substitute for the threshold at 3 kHz in pure tone audiometry? A study based on the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-2012.
Kim JY; Byun SW; Shin SH; Chun MS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201867. PubMed ID: 30086155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with SVR and PTA in normal hearing subjects].
Liu H; Zhu GY; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Wan L; Fan LH
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 20232737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
Lin YH; Chen PR; Hsu CJ; Wu HP
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss.
Ahn JH; Lee HS; Kim YJ; Yoon TH; Chung JW
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 136(6):966-71. PubMed ID: 17547989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A neural network approach to the prediction of pure tone thresholds with distortion product emissions.
Kimberley BP; Kimberley BM; Roth L
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Nov; 73(11):812-3, 817-23. PubMed ID: 7828474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is it valid to calculate the 3-kilohertz threshold by averaging 2 and 4 kilohertz?
Gurgel RK; Popelka GR; Oghalai JS; Blevins NH; Chang KW; Jackler RK
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):102-4. PubMed ID: 22301102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
