133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9728932)
1. Leukapheresis products in multiple myeloma: lower tumor load after mobilization with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) compared with G-CSF alone.
Cremer FW; Kiel K; Wallmeier M; Haas R; Goldschmidt H; Moos M
Exp Hematol; 1998 Sep; 26(10):969-75. PubMed ID: 9728932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CD34+ cells mobilized by cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are functionally different from CD34+ cells mobilized by G-CSF.
Cesana C; Carlo-Stella C; Regazzi E; Garau D; Sammarelli G; Caramatti C; Tabilio A; Mangoni L; Rizzoli V
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Mar; 21(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 9543059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Bellido M; Sureda A; Martino R; Madoz P; García J; Brunet S
Haematologica; 1998 May; 83(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9658727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection without close monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cells: A feasible strategy for multiple myeloma or pre-treated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma patients mobilized with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF.
Callera F; Cavenaghi L; de Melo CM
Transfus Apher Sci; 2009 Apr; 40(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19233728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide, sequential granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, and scheduled commencement of leukapheresis in 225 patients undergoing autologous transplantation.
Bashey A; Donohue M; Liu L; Medina B; Corringham S; Ihasz A; Carrier E; Castro JE; Holman PR; Xu R; Law P; Ball ED; Lane TA
Transfusion; 2007 Nov; 47(11):2153-60. PubMed ID: 17958545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilizes CD34+ cells with different stem and progenitor subsets and distinct functional properties in comparison with unconjugated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Bruns I; Steidl U; Fischer JC; Czibere A; Kobbe G; Raschke S; Singh R; Fenk R; Rosskopf M; Pechtel S; von Haeseler A; Wernet P; Tenen DG; Haas R; Kronenwett R
Haematologica; 2008 Mar; 93(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 18268278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blood stem cell collection using chemotherapy with or without systematic G-CSF: experience in 52 patients with multiple myeloma.
Lefrere F; Makke J; Fermand J; Marolleau J; Dal Cortivo L; Alberti C; Mouton V; Benbunan M; Miclea J
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Sep; 24(5):463-6. PubMed ID: 10482928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First and second apheresis in patients with multiple myeloma: no differences in tumor load and hematopoietic stem cell yield.
Kiel K; Cremer FW; Ehrbrecht E; Wallmeier M; Hegenbart U; Goldschmidt H; Moos M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Jun; 21(11):1109-15. PubMed ID: 9645573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of stem cell mobilization regimen on lymphocyte collection yield in patients with multiple myeloma.
Hiwase DK; Hiwase S; Bailey M; Bollard G; Schwarer AP
Cytotherapy; 2008; 10(5):507-17. PubMed ID: 18608354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients.
Lefrère F; Zohar S; Ghez D; Delarue R; Audat F; Suarez F; Hermine O; Damaj G; Maillard N; Ribeil JA; Azagury M; Misbahi R; Jondeau K; Cavazzana-Calvo M; Dal Cortivo L; Varet B
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 16518433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vinorelbine plus intermediate dose cyclophosphamide is an effective and safe regimen for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma.
Annunziata M; Celentano M; Pocali B; D'Amico MR; Palmieri S; Viola A; Copia C; Falco C; Del Vecchio L; Ferrara F
Ann Hematol; 2006 Jun; 85(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 16538502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intermediate-dose CY and G-CSF more efficiently mobilize adequate numbers of PBSC for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation compared with low-dose CY in patients with multiple myeloma.
Hiwase DK; Bollard G; Hiwase S; Bailey M; Muirhead J; Schwarer AP
Cytotherapy; 2007; 9(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 17882718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clonogenic potential and phenotypic analysis of CD34+ cells mobilized by different chemotherapy regimens.
Cesana C; Regazzi E; Garau D; Caramatti C; Mangoni L; Rizzoli V
Haematologica; 1999 Sep; 84(9):771-8. PubMed ID: 10477448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 or 7 g/m2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with multiple myeloma.
Goldschmidt H; Hegenbart U; Haas R; Hunstein W
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 May; 17(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 8733683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimising parameters for peripheral blood leukapheresis after r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) and r-metHuSCF (ancestim) in patients with multiple myeloma: a temporal analysis of CD34(+) absolute counts and subsets.
Chin-Yee IH; Keeney M; Stewart AK; Belch A; Bence-Buckler I; Couban S; Howson-Jan K; Rubinger M; Stewart D; Sutherland R; Paragamian V; Bhatia M; Foley R
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2002 Dec; 30(12):851-60. PubMed ID: 12476276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial comparing the combination of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of dendritic cell subsets in hematopoietic progenitor cell products.
Lonial S; Hicks M; Rosenthal H; Langston A; Redei I; Torre C; Duenzl M; Feinstein B; Cherry J; Waller EK
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Dec; 10(12):848-57. PubMed ID: 15570253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-dose or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jantunen E; Putkonen M; Nousiainen T; Pelliniemi TT; Mahlamäki E; Remes K
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2003 Mar; 31(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 12634725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by cyclophosphamide and rhGM-CSF in multiple myeloma.
Martínez E; Sureda A; Dalmases CD; Sánchez JA; Amill B; Tugues D; Sardá P; Miralles A; Brunet S; Domingo-Albós A; García J
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Jul; 18(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8831988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
