These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9729818)

  • 1. Efficacy of repeated psychophysiological detection of deception testing.
    Dollins AB; Cestaro VL; Pettit DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 9729818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information gain of psychophysiological detection of deception in forensic and screening settings.
    Honts CR; Schweinle W
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 19609667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finger pulse waveform length in the detection of concealed information.
    Elaad E; Ben-Shakhar G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 16712993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Concealed Information Test with multimodal measurement.
    Ambach W; Bursch S; Stark R; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):258-67. PubMed ID: 20026133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiating orienting and defensive responses to concealed information: the role of verbalization.
    Verschuere B; Crombez G; Smolders L; De Clercq A
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 19533337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of biofeedback on the detection of deception.
    Timm HW
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 May; 32(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 3598524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception?
    Kozel FA; Johnson KA; Laken SJ; Grenesko EL; Smith JA; Walker J; George MS
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 18633826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A psychophysiological study of determinants for detection of deception.
    Yamaoka K
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1976 Mar; 23(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 1065507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysiological response patterns of migraine patients in two habituation tests.
    Huber D; Henrich G; Gündel H
    Headache; 2005; 45(10):1375-87. PubMed ID: 16324170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination.
    Gamer M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Apr; 76(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20114064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The concealed information test as an instrument of applied differential psychophysiology: methodological considerations.
    Furedy JJ
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):149-60. PubMed ID: 19626435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge.
    Gamer M; Rill HG; Vossel G; Gödert HW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Apr; 60(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 16005091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A possible link between intelligence level and habituation of the GSR.
    Yehuda S; Shtrom C; Peter R
    Int J Neurosci; 1979; 9(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 437946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Countering countermeasures in the concealed information test using covert respiration measures.
    Elaad E; Ben-Shakhar G
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 19543828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
    Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extracting concealed information from groups.
    Meijer EH; Smulders FT; Merckelbach HL
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1607-9. PubMed ID: 20533975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining physiological measures in the detection of concealed information.
    Gamer M; Verschuere B; Crombez G; Vossel G
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Oct; 95(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 18638496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: the effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items.
    Furedy JJ; Gigliotti F; Ben-Shakhar G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Oct; 18(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 7876035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.