These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9730734)

  • 1. High-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy versus ultrasound and optical pachymetry for the measurement of corneal thickness.
    Pierro L; Conforto E; Resti AG; Lattanzio R
    Ophthalmologica; 1998; 212 Suppl 1():1-3. PubMed ID: 9730734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.
    Tam ES; Rootman DS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1179-84. PubMed ID: 12842687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry, konan noncontact optical pachymetry, and orbscan pachymetry.
    Christensen A; Narváez J; Zimmerman G
    Cornea; 2008 Sep; 27(8):862-5. PubMed ID: 18724143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of optical and ultrasound central corneal pachymetry.
    Sallet G
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (281):35-8. PubMed ID: 11702641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and digital caliper in frozen canine corneas.
    Jeong S; Kang S; Park S; Park E; Lim J; Nam T; Seo K
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):339-346. PubMed ID: 29111598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of ultrasound pachymetry and partial coherence interferometry in the measurement of central corneal thickness.
    Rainer G; Petternel V; Findl O; Schmetterer L; Skorpik C; Luksch A; Drexler W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Dec; 28(12):2142-5. PubMed ID: 12498849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.
    Jahadi Hosseini HR; Katbab A; Khalili MR; Abtahi MB
    Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1091-5. PubMed ID: 20628301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of central corneal thickness in dogs measured by ultrasound pachymetry and ultrasound biomicroscopy.
    Martín-Suárez E; Galán A; Morgaz J; Guisado A; Gallardo JM; Gómez-Villamandos RJ
    Vet J; 2018 Feb; 232():13-14. PubMed ID: 29428083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography with ultrasound pachymetry.
    Zhao PS; Wong TY; Wong WL; Saw SM; Aung T
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 143(6):1047-9. PubMed ID: 17524777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the corneal thickness measurements with the Pentacam HR imaging system and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Módis L; Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A
    Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 21139499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparability of corneal thickness and opacity depth assessed by OCT and UBM.
    Garcia PN; Chamon W; Allemann N
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 259(7):1915-1923. PubMed ID: 33763731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
    Prospero Ponce CM; Rocha KM; Smith SD; Krueger RR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19465292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography.
    Amano S; Honda N; Amano Y; Yamagami S; Miyai T; Samejima T; Ogata M; Miyata K
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jun; 113(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 16751036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry in measuring corneal graft thickness.
    Gaujoux T; Borderie VM; Yousfi H; Bourcier T; Touzeau O; Laroche L
    Cornea; 2007 Feb; 26(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17251810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurements of central corneal thickness using two immersion ultrasound techniques and optical technique.
    AlFarhan HM
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 24864597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparison of corneal thickness measurement: ultrasound versus optical methods.
    Chaidaroon W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 12859104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating central corneal thickness measurements with noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometry and contact ultrasound pachymetry.
    Airiani S; Trokel SL; Lee SM; Braunstein RE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):164-5. PubMed ID: 16815271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Elbaz U; Schwartz S; Ken-Dror G; Avni I; Zadok D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1729-35. PubMed ID: 16246776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graft central thickness measurement by rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry after penetrating keratoplasty.
    de Sanctis U; Missolungi A; Mutani B; Grignolo FM
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1461-8. PubMed ID: 17678690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting sulcus size using ocular measurements.
    Pop M; Payette Y; Mansour M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Jul; 27(7):1033-8. PubMed ID: 11489572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.