These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9731867)

  • 21. Comparative utility of repeat Papanicolaou smears, cervicography, and colposcopy in the evaluation of atypical Papanicolaou smears.
    Spitzer M; Krumholz BA; Chernys AE; Seltzer V; Lightman AR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):731-5. PubMed ID: 3106869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears.
    Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries.
    Cuzick J; Arbyn M; Sankaranarayanan R; Tsu V; Ronco G; Mayrand MH; Dillner J; Meijer CJ
    Vaccine; 2008 Aug; 26 Suppl 10():K29-41. PubMed ID: 18847555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of single-, double- and triple-combined testing, including Pap test, HPV DNA test and cervicography, as screening methods for the detection of uterine cervical cancer.
    Kim JH; Kim IW; Kim YW; Park DC; Kim YW; Lee KH; Ahn TG; Han SJ; Ahn WS
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Apr; 29(4):1645-51. PubMed ID: 23443346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes.
    Elias A; Linthorst G; Bekker B; Vooijs PG
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 6575534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervicography. Does it improve cervical cancer screening?
    Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J; Meyer P; Philippe E
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 9100757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is there a role for cervicography in the detection of premalignant lesions of the uterine cervix?: a Brazilian experience.
    Gasperin P; Francisco JA; Tizzot EL; Curcio L; Couto Filho Jd; Moreira PR; Pascotini CM; de Azevedo EM; Coibion M; Budel VM; de Carvalho NS
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Oct; 16(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 22659773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cervicography: an intermediate triage test for the evaluation of cervical atypia.
    Ferris DG; Payne P; Frisch LE
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Nov; 37(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 8228858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [How technology and vaccination have changed the Pap test].
    Bondi A; Ghidoni D; Amadori A
    Pathologica; 1999 Feb; 91(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 10396949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effectiveness of automated cervical cytology rescreening using the AutoPap 300 QC System.
    Stevens MW; Milne AJ; James KA; Brancheau D; Ellison D; Kuan L
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Jun; 16(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 9181316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervicography as an adjunct to cytologic screening.
    Greenberg MD; Campion MJ; Rutledge LH
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1993 Mar; 20(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 8332306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical scrapes by the polymerase chain reaction in relation to cytology: possible implications for cervical cancer screening.
    Meijer CJ; van den Brule AJ; Snijders PJ; Helmerhorst T; Kenemans P; Walboomers JM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (119):271-81. PubMed ID: 1330917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Should cervical cytologic testing be augmented by cervicography or human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid detection?
    Reid R; Greenberg MD; Lorincz A; Jenson AB; Laverty CR; Husain M; Daoud Y; Zado B; White T; Cantor D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 164(6 Pt 1):1461-9; discussion 1469-71. PubMed ID: 1646568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated cervical cytology: meta-analyses of the performance of the PAPNET system.
    Abulafia O; Sherer DM
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Apr; 54(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 10198930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervicography: adjunctive cervical cancer screening by primary care clinicians.
    Ferris DG; Payne P; Frisch LE; Milner FH; diPaola FM; Petry LJ
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 37(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 8336097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of the screening error rate from the observed detection rates in repeated cercival cytology.
    Coppleson LW; Brown B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Aug; 119(7):953-8. PubMed ID: 4841153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Automation of cytological analysis of cervical smears].
    Cenci M; Giovagnoli MR; Olla SV; Drusco A; Vecchione A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999; 51(7-8):291-8. PubMed ID: 10536424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural network rescreening for the detection of abnormal cervical cells.
    Mango LJ
    Am Clin Lab; 1996; 15(10):12-3. PubMed ID: 10164048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Cytological screening of uterine cervical cancer by samples in liquid medium (CytoRich). Preliminary study of a series of 111 292 patients].
    Saurel J; Rabreau M; Landi M; Bondu C; Montoya G; Morancé C; Auber M; Percheron N; Santa-Maria M; Bec M; Berteau MJ; Muller E; Gominet C; Besserves S; Thomas E
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Dec; 27(12):853-7. PubMed ID: 10676042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.