These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9731873)

  • 1. Some concerns about the new research guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Bernardes J; Pereira AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Aug; 179(2):560-1. PubMed ID: 9731873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):276-7. PubMed ID: 9704806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic fetal monitoring of the preterm fetus.
    Baird SM; Ruth DJ
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2002 Jun; 16(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 12083292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines.
    Macones GA; Hankins GD; Spong CY; Hauth J; Moore T
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2008; 37(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 18761565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation.
    Amin P
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):588. PubMed ID: 25702549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation.
    Sholapurkar SL
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):589-90. PubMed ID: 25702551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now?
    Chez BF; Baird SM
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2011; 25(2):180-92; quiz 193-4. PubMed ID: 21540697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum fetal surveillance: review of three national guidelines.
    Hill JB; Chauhan SP; Magann EF; Morrison JC; Abuhamad AZ
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Aug; 29(7):539-50. PubMed ID: 22522936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: applying principles of patient safety.
    Miller DA; Miller LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 206(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 22000897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal ECG analysis for intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a review.
    Devoe LD
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 21278502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of the electronic fetal heart rate during labor.
    Sweha A; Hacker TW; Nuovo J
    Am Fam Physician; 1999 May; 59(9):2487-500. PubMed ID: 10323356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating a new technology: the effectiveness of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Shy KK; Larson EB; Luthy DA
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1987; 8():165-90. PubMed ID: 3555520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal heart rate auscultation. Comparing auscultation to electronic fetal monitoring.
    Feinstein NF; Sprague A; Trepanier MJ
    AWHONN Lifelines; 2000; 4(3):35-44. PubMed ID: 11249387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance: American College of Nurse-Midwives.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 26461195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Sandmire HF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):880-1. PubMed ID: 8414344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why are we using electronic fetal monitoring?
    Kripke CC
    Am Fam Physician; 1999 May; 59(9):2416, 2421-2. PubMed ID: 10323350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The significance of internal electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate. Report of 144 cases].
    Li K
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1991 Jan; 71(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 1850651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal assessment during pregnancy.
    Farley D; Dudley DJ
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 56(3):489-504, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19501688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic fetal monitoring.
    Tallon RW
    Nurs Manage; 1996 Jun; 27(6):49-51. PubMed ID: 8788789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Thornton P
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2012 Mar; 41(2):160-162. PubMed ID: 22390285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.