These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9733340)

  • 1. A 10-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale to measure major depressive episode severity in outpatients.
    Benazzi F
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1998 Aug; 13(8):570-1. PubMed ID: 9733340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in elderly depressed patients.
    Mittmann N; Herrmann N; Shulman KI; Silver I; Shear N; Naranjo CA
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1998 Aug; 13(8):573-4. PubMed ID: 9733342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading depression severity by symptom scores: is it a valid method for subclassifying depressive disorders?
    Kitamura T; Nakagawa Y; Machizawa S
    Compr Psychiatry; 1993; 34(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 8348808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: The making of a "gold standard" and the unmaking of a chronic illness, 1960-1980.
    Worboys M
    Chronic Illn; 2013 Sep; 9(3):202-19. PubMed ID: 23172888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Item Response analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using shared data from two pharmaceutical companies.
    Evans KR; Sills T; DeBrota DJ; Gelwicks S; Engelhardt N; Santor D
    J Psychiatr Res; 2004; 38(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 15003433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale endures.
    Bech P; Engelhardt N; Evans KR; Gibertini M; Kalali AH; Kobak KA; Lipsitz JD; Williams JB; Pearson JD; Rothman M
    Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 162(12):2396; author reply 2397-8. PubMed ID: 16330618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale endures.
    Corruble E; Hardy P
    Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 162(12):2394; author reply 2397-8. PubMed ID: 16330615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speaking a more consistent language when discussing severe depression: a calibration study of 3 self-report measures of depressive symptoms.
    Zimmerman M; Martinez JH; Friedman M; Boerescu DA; Attiullah N; Toba C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2014 Feb; 75(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 24345406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale endures.
    Licht RW; Bech P
    Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 162(12):2394-5; author reply 2397-8. PubMed ID: 16330614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and testing of a five-item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale.
    Hoyl MT; Alessi CA; Harker JO; Josephson KR; Pietruszka FM; Koelfgen M; Mervis JR; Fitten LJ; Rubenstein LZ
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1999 Jul; 47(7):873-8. PubMed ID: 10404935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for bipolar disorder in a Spanish sample of outpatients with current major depressive episode.
    Tafalla M; Sanchez-Moreno J; Diez T; Vieta E
    J Affect Disord; 2009 Apr; 114(1-3):299-304. PubMed ID: 18701169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of a depression rating scale for schizophrenics.
    Addington D; Addington J; Maticka-Tyndale E; Joyce J
    Schizophr Res; 1992 Mar; 6(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 1571313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression.
    Zimmerman M; Posternak MA; Chelminski I
    J Psychiatr Res; 2004; 38(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 15458853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychopathological dimensions of depression: a factor study of the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale in unipolar depressed outpatients.
    Pancheri P; Picardi A; Pasquini M; Gaetano P; Biondi M
    J Affect Disord; 2002 Feb; 68(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11869781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric evaluation of a 6-item Chinese version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Mokken scaling and item analysis.
    Lee CP; Liu CY; Hung CI
    Asia Pac Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 28585368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: the reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life.
    Zimmerman M; Ruggero CJ; Chelminski I; Young D; Posternak MA; Friedman M; Boerescu D; Attiullah N
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 67(10):1536-41. PubMed ID: 17107244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression.
    Rush AJ; Trivedi MH; Ibrahim HM; Carmody TJ; Arnow B; Klein DN; Markowitz JC; Ninan PT; Kornstein S; Manber R; Thase ME; Kocsis JH; Keller MB
    Biol Psychiatry; 2003 Sep; 54(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 12946886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity of the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
    O'Sullivan RL; Fava M; Agustin C; Baer L; Rosenbaum JF
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1997 May; 95(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 9197901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric assessment and clinical application of the Correa-Barrick Depression Rating Scale.
    Barrick CB; Taylor DE; Correa EI
    Clin Nurs Res; 2002 Nov; 11(4):363-81; discussion 382-6. PubMed ID: 12413111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severity classification on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
    Zimmerman M; Martinez JH; Young D; Chelminski I; Dalrymple K
    J Affect Disord; 2013 Sep; 150(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 23759278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.