These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9733560)

  • 1. Response channel activation and the temporoparietal junction.
    Ro T; Cohen A; Ivry RB; Rafal RD
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug; 37(3):461-76. PubMed ID: 9733560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neglect dyslexia: frequency, association with other hemispatial neglects, and lesion localization.
    Lee BH; Suh MK; Kim EJ; Seo SW; Choi KM; Kim GM; Chung CS; Heilman KM; Na DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):704-10. PubMed ID: 19100754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.
    Vandenberghe R; Geeraerts S; Molenberghs P; Lafosse C; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters K; Peeters R; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2843-57. PubMed ID: 15857928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemiextinction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right temporo-parietal junction.
    Meister IG; Wienemann M; Buelte D; Grünewald C; Sparing R; Dambeck N; Boroojerdi B
    Neuroscience; 2006 Sep; 142(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 16876326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disturbed line bisection is associated with posterior brain lesions.
    Rorden C; Fruhmann Berger M; Karnath HO
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 16519881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: two modified versions of the milner landmark task.
    Bisiach E; Ricci R; Lualdi M; Colombo MR
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug; 37(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 9733555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deafferentation-disconnection neglect induced by posterior cerebral artery infarction.
    Park KC; Lee BH; Kim EJ; Shin MH; Choi KM; Yoon SS; Kwon SU; Chung CS; Lee KH; Heilman KM; Na DL
    Neurology; 2006 Jan; 66(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 16401846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of primary and secondary influences on spatial neglect.
    Adair JC; Na DL; Schwartz RL; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug; 37(3):351-67. PubMed ID: 9733554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ipsilesional biases in saccades but not perception after lesions of the human inferior parietal lobule.
    Ro T; Rorden C; Driver J; Rafal R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 11595095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asynchronous stimulus presentation in visual extinction: a psychophysical study.
    Geeraerts S; Lafosse C; Vandenbussche E; Verfaillie K
    J Neuropsychol; 2010 Sep; 4(Pt 2):167-79. PubMed ID: 20188020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers.
    Fink GR; Marshall JC; Weiss PH; Zilles K
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contribution of spatial remapping impairments to unilateral visual neglect.
    Pisella L; Mattingley JB
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2004 Apr; 28(2):181-200. PubMed ID: 15172763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A psychophysical study of visual extinction: ipsilesional distractor interference with contralesional orientation thresholds in visual hemineglect patients.
    Geeraerts S; Lafosse C; Vandenbussche E; Verfaillie K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):530-41. PubMed ID: 15716143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial-temporal anisometries following right parietal damage.
    Snyder JJ; Chatterjee A
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1703-8. PubMed ID: 15327937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of right-hemisphere cortical infarction and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor blockade on spatial visual attention performance in rats.
    Hoff EI; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Liedenbaum M; Steinbusch HW; Blokland A
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 178(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 17196269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.