166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9733612)
1. Stereotactic core biopsy reduces the reexcision rate and the cost of mammographically detected cancer.
Lind DS; Minter R; Steinbach B; Abbitt P; Lanier L; Haigh L; Vauthey JN; Russin M; Hackett R; Copeland EM
J Surg Res; 1998 Jul; 78(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9733612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localization biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer.
Whitten TM; Wallace TW; Bird RE; Turk PS
Am Surg; 1997 Dec; 63(12):1072-7; discussion 1077-8. PubMed ID: 9393255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stereotactic core biopsy of the breast: results of one-year follow-up of 101 patients.
Pitre B; Baron PL; Baron LF; O'Brien PH; Cole DJ
Am Surg; 1997 Dec; 63(12):1124-7. PubMed ID: 9393264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficiency of Core Biopsy for BI-RADS-5 Breast Lesions.
Wolf R; Quan G; Calhoun K; Soot L; Skokan L
Breast J; 2008; 14(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 18821933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-benefit analysis of biopsy methods for suspicious mammographic lesions; discussion 994-5.
Fahy BN; Bold RJ; Schneider PD; Khatri V; Goodnight JE
Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):990-4. PubMed ID: 11529819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereotactic breast biopsy is accurate, minimally invasive, and cost effective.
Pettine S; Place R; Babu S; Williard W; Kim D; Carter P
Am J Surg; 1996 May; 171(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 8651388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of image-directed core biopsy on the practice of breast surgery: a new algorithm for a changing technology.
Stolier AJ; Rupley DG
Am Surg; 1997 Sep; 63(9):827-30. PubMed ID: 9290531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution.
Pass H; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Decker D; Pettinga J; Ingold J; Benitez P; Neumann K; Rebner M; Dekhne N; Martinez A
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 15305400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with close or focally involved margins following breast-conserving surgery: treatment with reexcision or radiotherapy with increased dosage.
Monteau A; Sigal-Zafrani B; Kirova YM; Fourchotte V; Bollet MA; Vincent-Salomon A; Asselain B; Salmon RJ; Fourquet A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 19386441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Excising the reexcision: stereotactic core-needle biopsy decreases need for reexcision of breast cancer.
Kaufman CS; Delbecq R; Jacobson L
World J Surg; 1998 Oct; 22(10):1023-7; discussion 1028. PubMed ID: 9747160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The treatment of clinically silent breast lesions].
Woźniczko I; Dabrowski M; Dabrowska M; Powazka P
Wiad Lek; 2005; 58(1-2):62-6. PubMed ID: 15991555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Winchester DJ; Bernstein JR; Jeske JM; Nicholson MH; Hahn EA; Goldschmidt RA; Watkin WG; Sener SF; Bilimoria MB; Barrera E; Winchester DP
Arch Surg; 2003 Jun; 138(6):619-22; discussion 622-3. PubMed ID: 12799332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings.
Lee CH; Egglin TK; Philpotts L; Mainiero MB; Tocino I
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 9051045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Results of stereotactic guidance of breast excisional biopsy versus stereotactic core biopsy in occult breast lesions].
Wolf G; Helbich T
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(14):316-20. PubMed ID: 9816641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative ultrasound versus mammographic needle localization for ductal carcinoma in situ.
James TA; Harlow S; Sheehey-Jones J; Hart M; Gaspari C; Stanley M; Krag D; Ashikaga T; McCahill LE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1164-9. PubMed ID: 19267159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.
Obedian E; Haffty BG
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
